Key Takeaways
- • JPMorgan Chase faces a proposed class action lawsuit alleging it enabled a $328 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme operated by Goliath Ventures and Christopher Delgado, with over 2,000 investors claiming substantial losses.
- • The bank allegedly processed approximately $253 million in deposits for Goliath Ventures between January 2023 and June 2025, and transferred roughly $123 million from the scheme's business account to cryptocurrency wallets at Coinbase.
- • Victims claim JPMorgan Chase failed in its anti-money laundering (AML) obligations despite encountering obvious red flags indicative of fraudulent activity, positioning the bank as an enabler of the scheme rather than a neutral financial intermediary.
- • The Delgado-operated scheme functioned as a classic Ponzi structure from January 2023 through January 2026, using new investor capital to pay earlier investors and fund personal enrichment, with a February 2026 federal criminal complaint filed by prosecutors in Florida.
- • The litigation parallels JPMorgan Chase's historical exposure as the primary financial institution for Bernard Madoff's decades-long Ponzi scheme, underscoring institutional liability risks when banks fail to detect or prevent illicit customer activity.
Summary
Victims of an alleged $328 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme have filed a proposed class action lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, asserting that the bank enabled the massive fraud through negligent oversight and failure to enforce anti-money laundering protocols. The lawsuit, styled Steele v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., targets the crypto investment firm Goliath Ventures and its operator, Christopher Delgado. According to filings, more than 2,000 investors lost hundreds of millions of dollars in the scheme.
The criminal mechanics of the fraud operated from January 2023 through January 2026. Delgado solicited victims to invest in purported cryptocurrency "liquidity pools," but instead diverted funds to pay earlier investors in classic Ponzi fashion while enriching himself through lavish personal spending. Federal prosecutors in Florida issued a criminal complaint against Delgado in February 2026 documenting the scheme's structure and scope.
JPMorgan Chase's role centers on its processing of suspicious financial flows without adequate detection or intervention. Between January 2023 and June 2025, the bank processed approximately $253 million in deposits into Goliath Ventures' business account. More critically, the bank transferred roughly $123 million from that account to cryptocurrency wallets at Coinbase—transfers that the lawsuit characterizes as glaring red flags of fraud that the bank ignored. Plaintiffs allege the bank collected fees while failing to meet its regulatory obligations under anti-money laundering statutes.
The litigation revives significant historical parallels to JPMorgan Chase's role as the primary financial institution for Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, which operated from the 1980s until December 2008. That legacy underscores the legal and reputational risks banks face when customers exploit business accounts for illicit enterprises. HSBC recently announced a $1.1 billion provision following an unfavorable Luxembourg ruling tied to Madoff-related litigation, illustrating the potential financial exposure from extended liability chains.
The case highlights the institutional tension between banks' fee-generating customer relationships and their regulatory duty to detect and prevent financial crime. For JPMorgan Chase, the lawsuit presents both legal risk and reputational vulnerability as a systemically important financial institution expected to maintain robust fraud detection systems.
The criminal mechanics of the fraud operated from January 2023 through January 2026. Delgado solicited victims to invest in purported cryptocurrency "liquidity pools," but instead diverted funds to pay earlier investors in classic Ponzi fashion while enriching himself through lavish personal spending. Federal prosecutors in Florida issued a criminal complaint against Delgado in February 2026 documenting the scheme's structure and scope.
JPMorgan Chase's role centers on its processing of suspicious financial flows without adequate detection or intervention. Between January 2023 and June 2025, the bank processed approximately $253 million in deposits into Goliath Ventures' business account. More critically, the bank transferred roughly $123 million from that account to cryptocurrency wallets at Coinbase—transfers that the lawsuit characterizes as glaring red flags of fraud that the bank ignored. Plaintiffs allege the bank collected fees while failing to meet its regulatory obligations under anti-money laundering statutes.
The litigation revives significant historical parallels to JPMorgan Chase's role as the primary financial institution for Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, which operated from the 1980s until December 2008. That legacy underscores the legal and reputational risks banks face when customers exploit business accounts for illicit enterprises. HSBC recently announced a $1.1 billion provision following an unfavorable Luxembourg ruling tied to Madoff-related litigation, illustrating the potential financial exposure from extended liability chains.
The case highlights the institutional tension between banks' fee-generating customer relationships and their regulatory duty to detect and prevent financial crime. For JPMorgan Chase, the lawsuit presents both legal risk and reputational vulnerability as a systemically important financial institution expected to maintain robust fraud detection systems.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.