AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

XRP ETF Buying Has Dropped 96% Since Launch: Can Inflows Reach Standard Chartered's $8 Billion Forecast?

Reported by 247wallst
Aug 16, 2026· 3 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • XRP spot ETF inflows have collapsed 96-97% from peak momentum, accumulating only $1.5 billion in cumulative flows across eight months of trading since November 2025, versus the $8 billion first-year forecast from JPMorgan (January 2025) and Standard Chartered (April 2025).
  • • Both major Wall Street institutions based their $4-$8 billion predictions on historical take-up rates from Bitcoin (6% of market cap) and Ethereum (3% of market cap) ETFs during their launch years, applying comparable percentages to XRP's smaller market capitalization.
  • • Standard Chartered has cut its XRP price target by 65%, from $8.00 to $2.80 for end-of-2026, citing the cryptocurrency's crash to $1.16 in February 2026 and the severe shortfall in ETF inflows that were supposed to drive price appreciation.
  • • Regulatory clarity—particularly the potential passage of the CLARITY Act and resolution of XRP's legal status—was a critical assumption underpinning the $4-$8 billion inflow forecasts, with analysts noting that altcoins still lacked SEC and CFTC regulatory framework at the time of the predictions.
  • • XRP now faces technical support concerns, with the asset at risk of breaking below the $1 psychological level as institutional ETF demand deteriorates and on-chain metrics weaken.
Summary
When JPMorgan published research in January 2025 projecting that spot XRP ETFs could attract $4 billion to $8 billion in first-year inflows, the forecast was grounded in established precedent. Bitcoin's spot ETFs had captured approximately 6% of Bitcoin's market capitalization in their inaugural year—roughly $108 billion—while Ethereum's funds absorbed about 3% of Ethereum's market cap. Applying these same take-up rates to XRP's comparatively smaller market capitalization produced the $4-$8 billion range. One month later, JPMorgan refined the estimate to $4.3 billion to $8.4 billion, though analysts flagged a critical caveat: altcoins still lacked regulatory clarity from both the SEC and CFTC. The forecast implicitly assumed that XRP's legal status would be resolved favorably under the incoming administration and new SEC leadership, which at the time appeared probable.

Standard Chartered echoed this optimism in April 2025 when Geoffrey Kendrick, the bank's head of digital assets research, initiated coverage with an identical $4-$8 billion first-year inflow projection for XRP ETFs. These forecasts became anchors for price targets; Standard Chartered initially set an ambitious $8.00 year-end 2026 target, driven by expectations that ETF inflows would materialize as regulatory barriers fell away.

The reality has proven starkly different. Since launching in mid-November 2025, XRP ETFs have accumulated approximately $1.5 billion in cumulative net inflows—roughly 18-19% of the low-end forecast and just 19% of the midpoint estimate. This represents a 96-97% collapse in ETF buying momentum from what institutional strategists had anticipated. The shortfall has forced Standard Chartered to recalibrate its outlook dramatically. Following XRP's crash to $1.16 in February 2026, the bank slashed its year-end 2026 price target by 65%, from $8.00 to $2.80, reflecting both the failed inflow thesis and deteriorating technical conditions.

The confluence of weakening ETF demand and slumping price action has created a concerning technical setup. XRP now trades near—and risks breaking below—the psychological $1 support level, with on-chain metrics showing institutional interest evaporating. Market observers have noted that the CLARITY Act, whose passage was contingent on achieving regulatory clarity around digital assets, has not materialized as a catalyst for the anticipated inflow wave. Whether institutional demand can reignite to approach Standard Chartered's original $4-$8 billion forecast remains an open question, but current trajectory suggests the gap between institutional expectations and actual market participation may be structural rather than cyclical.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial