Key Takeaways
- • UCITS hedge funds in Europe have experienced explosive growth since 2009, with assets expanding 10-fold, now matching offshore hedge fund AUM at several hundred billion each, signaling a structural shift in institutional and family office capital allocation toward regulated, liquid alternatives.
- • Five industry leaders presented investment theses at the 8th FERI Hedge Funds Investment Day (September 5, 2019): Marcus Storr (FERI) on regulatory trends, Harold de Boer (Transtrend) on systematic innovation, Crispin Odey on global market disconnects, Steven Gerbel (Chicago Capital) on spread dynamics, and Peter Schoenfeld on fundamental investing approaches.
- • Low-to-negative yields in traditional fixed income and equities have forced institutional investors and family offices to reconsider absolute return strategies, overturning pre-crisis stigma against hedge funds and alternative investments in German and broader European investor bases.
- • European institutional investors now prefer UCITS-regulated hedge funds over offshore structures due to enhanced liquidity, regulatory oversight, and operational transparency—a preference that has persisted post-financial crisis despite offshore funds maintaining stable AUM levels.
Summary
The 8th FERI Hedge Funds Investment Day convened institutional investors and family offices on September 5, 2019, to examine structural trends reshaping the alternative investment landscape. The event highlighted a fundamental reorientation of European capital toward hedge funds and absolute return strategies, driven by macroeconomic pressures rather than performance narratives alone.
Marcus Storr, Head of Hedge Funds at FERI Trust GmbH, anchored the discussion by examining the regulatory bifurcation between offshore and UCITS-compliant hedge funds. Storr noted that European-based hedge funds faced significant headwinds immediately following the 2008 financial crisis, remaining largely unpopular with institutional capital. However, the investment environment shifted materially in subsequent years. Assets under management in Europe-based offshore hedge funds remained essentially flat post-crisis, while UCITS alternative funds experienced extraordinary expansion—growing to approximately 10 times their 2009 asset base. Today, both structures command roughly equivalent pools of capital, each managing several hundred billion dollars.
This structural rebalancing reflects a deliberate investor preference for regulated vehicles. European institutional investors and family offices have increasingly gravitated toward UCITS funds, which offer enhanced liquidity, regulatory oversight, and operational transparency compared to offshore alternatives. Storr attributed this shift to two converging factors: persistently low-to-negative yields across traditional asset classes (government bonds, bank deposits) and a post-crisis institutional bias toward regulatory-driven investment environments that reduce counterparty and operational risk.
The conference also featured presentations from five portfolio managers addressing distinct market dynamics. Harold de Boer (Transtrend) emphasized systematic innovation; Crispin Odey highlighted perceived disconnects in global market valuations; Steven Gerbel discussed spread dynamics and capital flows; and Peter Schoenfeld presented fundamental investing approaches. These sessions reflected the conference's broader theme: that absolute return strategies had transitioned from discretionary tactical overlays to core institutional allocations, driven by structural yield compression rather than cyclical performance cycles.
Marcus Storr, Head of Hedge Funds at FERI Trust GmbH, anchored the discussion by examining the regulatory bifurcation between offshore and UCITS-compliant hedge funds. Storr noted that European-based hedge funds faced significant headwinds immediately following the 2008 financial crisis, remaining largely unpopular with institutional capital. However, the investment environment shifted materially in subsequent years. Assets under management in Europe-based offshore hedge funds remained essentially flat post-crisis, while UCITS alternative funds experienced extraordinary expansion—growing to approximately 10 times their 2009 asset base. Today, both structures command roughly equivalent pools of capital, each managing several hundred billion dollars.
This structural rebalancing reflects a deliberate investor preference for regulated vehicles. European institutional investors and family offices have increasingly gravitated toward UCITS funds, which offer enhanced liquidity, regulatory oversight, and operational transparency compared to offshore alternatives. Storr attributed this shift to two converging factors: persistently low-to-negative yields across traditional asset classes (government bonds, bank deposits) and a post-crisis institutional bias toward regulatory-driven investment environments that reduce counterparty and operational risk.
The conference also featured presentations from five portfolio managers addressing distinct market dynamics. Harold de Boer (Transtrend) emphasized systematic innovation; Crispin Odey highlighted perceived disconnects in global market valuations; Steven Gerbel discussed spread dynamics and capital flows; and Peter Schoenfeld presented fundamental investing approaches. These sessions reflected the conference's broader theme: that absolute return strategies had transitioned from discretionary tactical overlays to core institutional allocations, driven by structural yield compression rather than cyclical performance cycles.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.