Key Takeaways
- • Dan Loeb's Third Point Investors decisively defeated a shareholder proposal by activist rival Asset Value Investors to remove board member Josh Targoff, with 30 million votes against the measure versus 9 million in favor—a clear margin of victory for Loeb.
- • Asset Value Investors has criticized Third Point Investors for trading at a 13% discount to its net asset value, contending the discount represents poor stewardship; AVI claims it retained majority support among independent shareholders when excluding VoteCo's 40% stake.
- • Loeb dismissed AVI as a "gadfly" on Twitter and characterized the activist challenge as "infantile," reflecting the irony of an activist investor facing pressure from rival activists over governance and valuation concerns.
- • Third Point's main fund delivered stellar 37.9% returns through October 2021, providing Loeb with strong performance metrics to defend against criticism despite the discount issue persisting at the trust level.
- • To permanently resolve shareholder discontent, Loeb will need to close the 13% valuation discount between Third Point Investors' trading price and its underlying net asset value—currently the primary grievance fueling activist pressure.
Summary
Dan Loeb, the billionaire founder of Third Point LLC and prominent activist investor, successfully fended off a shareholder rebellion at Third Point Investors, a UK-listed closed-end trust holding a stake in his main fund. Asset Value Investors (AVI), itself an activist shareholder, sought to remove Josh Targoff, a Third Point employee, from the trust's board as part of broader pressure over the fund's governance and valuation metrics.
The vote delivered a decisive victory for Loeb, with 30 million shares cast against the removal proposal compared to 9 million in favor. However, the contest highlights the contentious nature of activist investing when activists themselves become targets. AVI has contended that excluding the votes of VoteCo, an independent body holding 40% of the trust's shares, it retained support from a majority of independent shareholders—though this interpretation did not carry the day in the formal ballot.
The root of AVI's grievance centers on Third Point Investors trading at a 13% discount to its net asset value, a persistent valuation gap AVI argues reflects poor capital management. Loeb's response has been dismissive; he called AVI a "gadfly" in a Twitter post and characterized the activist's conduct as "infantile." The irony is notable: Loeb himself is a prominent activist investor currently pressing for strategic changes at Royal Dutch Shell and other major corporations, yet now faces activist pressure on his own vehicle.
Despite the governance clash, Loeb's operational track record provides a buffer against sustained criticism. Third Point's main fund posted returns of 37.9% through October 2021, a stellar performance that limits the ammunition available to dissident shareholders. Nevertheless, the 13% discount at the trust level persists as a legitimate concern and structural weakness. To permanently silence activists like AVI, Loeb will likely need to address the valuation discount directly—a challenge that may require either improved performance attribution or structural changes to the trust's operations or fee arrangement.
The vote delivered a decisive victory for Loeb, with 30 million shares cast against the removal proposal compared to 9 million in favor. However, the contest highlights the contentious nature of activist investing when activists themselves become targets. AVI has contended that excluding the votes of VoteCo, an independent body holding 40% of the trust's shares, it retained support from a majority of independent shareholders—though this interpretation did not carry the day in the formal ballot.
The root of AVI's grievance centers on Third Point Investors trading at a 13% discount to its net asset value, a persistent valuation gap AVI argues reflects poor capital management. Loeb's response has been dismissive; he called AVI a "gadfly" in a Twitter post and characterized the activist's conduct as "infantile." The irony is notable: Loeb himself is a prominent activist investor currently pressing for strategic changes at Royal Dutch Shell and other major corporations, yet now faces activist pressure on his own vehicle.
Despite the governance clash, Loeb's operational track record provides a buffer against sustained criticism. Third Point's main fund posted returns of 37.9% through October 2021, a stellar performance that limits the ammunition available to dissident shareholders. Nevertheless, the 13% discount at the trust level persists as a legitimate concern and structural weakness. To permanently silence activists like AVI, Loeb will likely need to address the valuation discount directly—a challenge that may require either improved performance attribution or structural changes to the trust's operations or fee arrangement.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.