Key Takeaways
- • Arvind Jain, co-founder of Rubrik and Glean (valued at $7.2 billion), identifies "thinking crazy" as the defining trait shared by Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin and current Google CEO Sundar Pichai—a quality he credits with enabling breakthrough innovation despite conventional wisdom suggesting otherwise.
- • Pichai's championing of Google Chrome exemplifies this principle: the browser initiative faced internal skepticism and external dismissal (Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer called it a "rounding error"), yet Pichai's confidence in the counterintuitive idea proved transformative for Google's competitive positioning.
- • Jain's observation of Pichai's career trajectory—from individual contributor to Google CEO in August 2015, over a decade after joining—informed his understanding that raw intelligence and accomplishment alone do not predict success; willingness to pursue seemingly foolish ideas separates high performers from those who plateau.
- • The case study underscores a critical distinction for institutional investors evaluating technology leadership: intensity and hard work are table stakes, but the ability to think beyond consensus constraints and execute on contrarian conviction drives enterprise value creation.
Summary
Arvind Jain, co-founder of data management platform Rubrik and AI-powered enterprise search company Glean, credits his years observing Sundar Pichai at Google with shaping his philosophy on leadership and innovation. Jain, who joined Google as an engineer despite feeling like an "imposter" upon arrival from a small Indian town, made a deliberate practice of studying high performers around him—particularly Pichai, who had just joined as an individual contributor when Jain first encountered him.
Jain identified a consistent pattern among those who advanced: beyond the obvious markers of elite education, accomplished résumés, and intellectual horsepower, the distinguishing factor was what he terms the ability to "think crazy"—specifically, the capacity to pursue ambitious ideas that defy conventional wisdom. This attribute, Jain argues, was shared by Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and is exemplified in Pichai's career trajectory, culminating in his appointment as Google CEO in August 2015.
The inflection point for Jain's insight came through Pichai's stewardship of Google Chrome. At the time of Chrome's conception, the browser market appeared saturated and unpromising: Microsoft dominated the space, Netscape had already failed, and few Google employees—Jain included—saw strategic merit in the effort. Jain acknowledged, "I felt like that's such a bad idea. I was not thinking big enough." Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer publicly dismissed Chrome as a "rounding error," reflecting institutional skepticism. Yet Pichai's conviction in the project, despite its apparent foolishness on paper, proved prescient; Chrome became central to Google's ecosystem dominance and competitive moat.
Jain's observation underscores a critical distinction for evaluating executive performance and organizational potential: while intensity, hard work, and domain expertise are prerequisites for leadership, the willingness to champion ideas that contradict prevailing assumptions—and the confidence to pursue them—separates transformative operators from capable-but-plateauing performers. For institutional investors assessing technology companies and their leadership benches, this framework suggests that contrarian conviction, tempered by execution capability, may be a more predictive indicator of value creation than traditional pedigree metrics alone.
Jain identified a consistent pattern among those who advanced: beyond the obvious markers of elite education, accomplished résumés, and intellectual horsepower, the distinguishing factor was what he terms the ability to "think crazy"—specifically, the capacity to pursue ambitious ideas that defy conventional wisdom. This attribute, Jain argues, was shared by Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and is exemplified in Pichai's career trajectory, culminating in his appointment as Google CEO in August 2015.
The inflection point for Jain's insight came through Pichai's stewardship of Google Chrome. At the time of Chrome's conception, the browser market appeared saturated and unpromising: Microsoft dominated the space, Netscape had already failed, and few Google employees—Jain included—saw strategic merit in the effort. Jain acknowledged, "I felt like that's such a bad idea. I was not thinking big enough." Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer publicly dismissed Chrome as a "rounding error," reflecting institutional skepticism. Yet Pichai's conviction in the project, despite its apparent foolishness on paper, proved prescient; Chrome became central to Google's ecosystem dominance and competitive moat.
Jain's observation underscores a critical distinction for evaluating executive performance and organizational potential: while intensity, hard work, and domain expertise are prerequisites for leadership, the willingness to champion ideas that contradict prevailing assumptions—and the confidence to pursue them—separates transformative operators from capable-but-plateauing performers. For institutional investors assessing technology companies and their leadership benches, this framework suggests that contrarian conviction, tempered by execution capability, may be a more predictive indicator of value creation than traditional pedigree metrics alone.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.