Key Takeaways
- • Long/short equity hedge funds have dramatically underperformed their beta exposure over the past eight years: from January 2009 through February 2017, active managers (HFRX EH index) returned 17.5% cumulatively while the beta of long/short equity (BRILSE index) returned 148.1%, a gap of 130.6 percentage points.
- • Active hedge fund managers significantly reduced net exposure following the 2008 financial crisis, causing their performance to diverge sharply from the long/short equity strategy's inherent beta as quantitative easing and central bank intervention drove sustained stock market gains exceeding 18% annually.
- • Investors are not only failing to capture alpha from long/short hedge funds but are also receiving substantially less beta exposure than the strategy itself delivers, fundamentally undermining the risk-adjusted return proposition that justifies the strategy's fee structure.
- • The "lost decade" reflects a structural shift in the hedge fund industry characterized by higher asset levels, increased manager proliferation, and reduced concentration of talent, reversing conditions that previously allowed active managers to extract meaningful alpha from long/short positions.
- • The post-crisis caution of hedge fund managers, while intended to preserve capital and business viability, has left investors underexposed to a bull market that contradicted their pessimistic positioning on central bank intervention and economic recovery.
Summary
The divergence between active manager performance and long/short beta emerged as a direct consequence of portfolio positioning decisions made during and after the 2008 financial crisis. As financial system stability deteriorated, active hedge fund managers systematically reduced net exposure to protect their businesses and capital. This defensive posture, maintained throughout the subsequent period of quantitative easing and central bank intervention, left managers structurally underexposed to an equity market that compounded at over 18% annually. While the HFRX EH index tracking active manager performance gained 17.5% cumulatively through February 2017, the BRI Long/Short Equity Index (BRILSE), which captures the pure beta of the long/short strategy, returned 148.1%—a gap of 130.6 percentage points that underscores the cost of persistent skepticism toward the market recovery.
The widening performance gap reflects a fundamental shift in hedge fund industry dynamics. During earlier periods when active managers successfully captured long/short risk premia, the industry was characterized by fewer funds, lower aggregate assets under management, and arguably higher concentration of specialized talent. The subsequent expansion of the hedge fund universe, combined with substantially larger industry AUM, has coincided with a loss of alpha generation capacity. The correlation between active manager performance and long/short beta indices, which remained tight during the pre-crisis era, fractured sharply following 2008 and has not recovered.
Investors now face a critical realization: the fees paid to long/short hedge fund managers are not generating the alpha expected from active management, nor are they reliably delivering the full beta exposure available from a systematic long/short strategy. This dual underperformance places the hedge fund industry under significant business pressure, particularly as allocators reassess whether the risk-adjusted return profile justifies the cost structure relative to alternative equity strategies.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.