Key Takeaways
- • Liongate Capital Management concealed a $18.5 million investment in Fairfield Sentry, the largest Madoff feeder fund, while explicitly denying Madoff exposure to Principal Financial Group during acquisition discussions in 2015.
- • Liongate founders Randall Dillard, Jeff Holland, and Ben Funk maintained locked files documenting the Fairfield Sentry investment in their London office safe, which Principal discovered in late June 2015 when opening the secured container with manufacturers' assistance.
- • Principal Financial Group is pursuing damages totaling approximately $24 million against Liongate, including the acquisition price, $1 million in legal fees, and $4 million for employee time wasted, claiming breach of contract and deceit.
- • The $18.5 million Fairfield Sentry position represented approximately 0.9% of Liongate's $2 billion assets under management, but the concealment during a half-firm sale negotiation constituted material misrepresentation.
- • The case underscores persistent regulatory and due diligence failures in the fund-of-funds sector three years after Madoff's 2008 arrest, with feeder fund exposure remaining undisclosed despite explicit inquiries from sophisticated institutional buyers.
Summary
Liongate Capital Management, a London-based fund of hedge funds, engaged in material misrepresentation regarding its exposure to Bernard Madoff's investment scheme during negotiations to sell a controlling stake to Principal Financial Group. The firm had allocated $18.5 million of its $2 billion in assets under management to Fairfield Sentry, the largest feeder fund channeling capital into Madoff Securities LLC. When Principal inquired about Madoff exposure during the 2015 acquisition discussions, Liongate's investor relations manager categorically stated the firm "was never invested in Madoff" and offered to explain why Madoff represented an inappropriate investment for prudent fund-of-funds operators—a statement that was simultaneously true and false given the undisclosed Fairfield Sentry position.
The three principals of Liongate—Randall Dillard (founder), Jeff Holland (head of research), and Ben Funk (co-founder/owner)—maintained documentation of the Fairfield Sentry investment in a locked safe at the firm's Mayfair offices. Rather than disclosing this material investment or destroying the evidence, the trio apparently relied on restricted access to conceal the position. Principal discovered the files in late June 2015 when opening the secured safe with assistance from the safe's manufacturers, revealing the long-concealed Fairfield Sentry exposure only after the acquisition discussions had proceeded under false pretenses.
Principal Financial Group subsequently filed legal action against Liongate, claiming breach of contract and deceit. The financial institution is seeking damages exceeding $24 million, comprising the acquisition price paid for the firm, approximately $1 million in legal fees incurred during the sale process, and nearly $4 million in compensation for employee time expended on what proved to be a transaction based on material misrepresentation. The claim that Liongate had "misappropriated" the $18.5 million of investor funds further complicates the liability picture, suggesting Principal views the entire Fairfield Sentry position as improperly allocated capital.
This case represents a significant governance failure within the alternative asset management sector, occurring three years after Madoff's 2008 arrest and well into the industry's consolidation around transparency and due diligence protocols. The incident demonstrates that even institutional buyers conducting acquisition due diligence faced resistance from fund managers attempting to conceal documented exposure to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history. The concealment strategy—maintaining physical files while providing oral denials—highlights both the prevalence of Madoff feeder fund exposure across the hedge fund ecosystem and the inadequacy of disclosure mechanisms within fund-of-funds structures during the post-2008 regulatory environment.
The three principals of Liongate—Randall Dillard (founder), Jeff Holland (head of research), and Ben Funk (co-founder/owner)—maintained documentation of the Fairfield Sentry investment in a locked safe at the firm's Mayfair offices. Rather than disclosing this material investment or destroying the evidence, the trio apparently relied on restricted access to conceal the position. Principal discovered the files in late June 2015 when opening the secured safe with assistance from the safe's manufacturers, revealing the long-concealed Fairfield Sentry exposure only after the acquisition discussions had proceeded under false pretenses.
Principal Financial Group subsequently filed legal action against Liongate, claiming breach of contract and deceit. The financial institution is seeking damages exceeding $24 million, comprising the acquisition price paid for the firm, approximately $1 million in legal fees incurred during the sale process, and nearly $4 million in compensation for employee time expended on what proved to be a transaction based on material misrepresentation. The claim that Liongate had "misappropriated" the $18.5 million of investor funds further complicates the liability picture, suggesting Principal views the entire Fairfield Sentry position as improperly allocated capital.
This case represents a significant governance failure within the alternative asset management sector, occurring three years after Madoff's 2008 arrest and well into the industry's consolidation around transparency and due diligence protocols. The incident demonstrates that even institutional buyers conducting acquisition due diligence faced resistance from fund managers attempting to conceal documented exposure to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history. The concealment strategy—maintaining physical files while providing oral denials—highlights both the prevalence of Madoff feeder fund exposure across the hedge fund ecosystem and the inadequacy of disclosure mechanisms within fund-of-funds structures during the post-2008 regulatory environment.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.