Key Takeaways
- • Former trader Bharat Garg is suing London-based hedge fund Eisler Capital for £2.5 million ($3.4 million) in damages, alleging wrongful dismissal following his arrest in November and subsequent termination in December.
- • Garg's legal team argues the arrest was "not connected in any way with his employment" and that the criminal investigation was dropped days after he lost his job, suggesting the dismissal lacked proper cause.
- • Eisler Capital is countersuing for £768,982 in unpaid bonuses, establishing a bilateral legal dispute centered on employment governance and disclosure protocols at the hedge fund.
- • The case highlights critical gaps in hedge fund hiring practices and employment disclosure procedures, particularly regarding how firms handle employee arrests and criminal investigations during the onboarding process.
- • The dispute centers on Eisler's delay in disclosing Garg's arrest during his short-lived employment, raising questions about compliance obligations and procedural fairness in alternative asset management hiring.
Summary
Eisler Capital, a London-based hedge fund, faces a £2.5 million ($3.4 million) wrongful dismissal lawsuit from former trader Bharat Garg, according to court filings. Garg was terminated in December 2024 following his arrest in November on an allegation of a sexual nature. The legal action centers on the timing and handling of the arrest disclosure and the subsequent dismissal decision.
Garg's legal representatives contend that his arrest was entirely unrelated to his professional duties and employment at Eisler Capital. Critically, they note that the criminal investigation was dropped within days of his termination, suggesting that the charges lacked substance or that the dismissal may have been precipitous. The lawyers argue this sequence of events constitutes wrongful dismissal, as the basis for termination was removed shortly after the employment was severed.
Eisler Capital has mounted a counterclaim, seeking £768,982 in unpaid bonuses owed to Garg, transforming the dispute into a bilateral legal contest. The fund asserts it acted within its rights to terminate Garg, implying that either the arrest itself or the delay in its disclosure violated employment terms or regulatory requirements at the firm.
The case has emerged as a notable focal point for broader questions about employment governance and hiring practices in the hedge fund industry. It raises questions about how alternative asset managers screen employees during onboarding, the circumstances under which arrests trigger dismissal, and the disclosure obligations firms face when employees encounter legal complications. For institutional investors and family offices allocating capital to hedge funds, this dispute underscores the importance of understanding operational risk management and HR compliance frameworks at investment firms.
Garg's legal representatives contend that his arrest was entirely unrelated to his professional duties and employment at Eisler Capital. Critically, they note that the criminal investigation was dropped within days of his termination, suggesting that the charges lacked substance or that the dismissal may have been precipitous. The lawyers argue this sequence of events constitutes wrongful dismissal, as the basis for termination was removed shortly after the employment was severed.
Eisler Capital has mounted a counterclaim, seeking £768,982 in unpaid bonuses owed to Garg, transforming the dispute into a bilateral legal contest. The fund asserts it acted within its rights to terminate Garg, implying that either the arrest itself or the delay in its disclosure violated employment terms or regulatory requirements at the firm.
The case has emerged as a notable focal point for broader questions about employment governance and hiring practices in the hedge fund industry. It raises questions about how alternative asset managers screen employees during onboarding, the circumstances under which arrests trigger dismissal, and the disclosure obligations firms face when employees encounter legal complications. For institutional investors and family offices allocating capital to hedge funds, this dispute underscores the importance of understanding operational risk management and HR compliance frameworks at investment firms.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.