Key Takeaways
- • Prisma Capital Partners and Blackstone Alternative Asset Management filed breach-of-contract lawsuits in Delaware's Court of Chancery against Kentucky Retirement Systems, seeking reimbursement for legal expenses and potential damages stemming from a separate fraud allegation.
- • Eight public employees whose pensions are held by KRS filed a lawsuit in late 2017 alleging that major investment firms, including Prisma and Blackstone, defrauded KRS on approximately $1.5 billion in hedge fund investments beginning in 2011, citing excessive fees, poor returns, and inadequate risk disclosure.
- • The underlying fraud suit characterizes the hedge funds as "extremely high-risk, secretive, opaque, high-fee and illiquid vehicles" that produced losses and created crippling debt for Kentucky, with claims that investment firms and wealthy individual owners should bear repayment responsibility.
- • The legal team prosecuting the original fraud case includes Michelle Ciccarelli Lerach (San Diego-based attorney and Kentucky native), Louisville attorney Ann Oldfather, and Bill Lerach (identified as "pension consultant"), a disbarred California class-action lawyer.
- • KRS, described as cash-strapped, has declined to comment on pending litigation; the pension agency faces potential indemnification claims from hedge fund managers based on contractual language that could shield defendants from liability.
Summary
The central dispute involves a lawsuit filed in late 2017 by eight public employees whose pensions are administered by KRS. These plaintiffs allege that several major investment firms, including Prisma and Blackstone, systematically defrauded KRS on approximately $1.5 billion in hedge fund investments beginning in 2011. The complaint asserts that KRS trustees and officials bear shared responsibility for the alleged malfeasance. The hedge funds in question are characterized as producing "excessive fees, poor returns and ultimately losses," saddling the state with debt that should be recovered from the investment firms and their principals.
The original fraud complaint describes the hedge fund investments as "extremely high-risk, secretive, opaque, high-fee and illiquid vehicles" that carried material risks not adequately disclosed to KRS at the time of investment. This characterization underscores allegations of fiduciary breach—a centerpiece of pension fraud litigation. The legal team prosecuting the case includes Michelle Ciccarelli Lerach, a Kentucky native now based in San Diego; Louisville attorney Ann Oldfather; and Bill Lerach, a disbarred California class-action lawyer working as a "pension consultant" on the matter.
KRS, described in reporting as financially distressed, has remained silent on the pending litigation through executive director David Eager. The hedge fund managers' counterstrategy—suing KRS for breach of contract—signals their reliance on indemnification clauses within their investment agreements, positioning the pension agency as potentially liable for legal costs and damages even if the underlying fraud allegations prove substantiated. This litigation structure creates a financial pressure on KRS regardless of the fraud case outcome, complicating settlement calculations for an already cash-constrained public pension system.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.