Key Takeaways
- • Macro hedge funds sustained significant losses in the week of December 18, 2025, with at least one large hedge fund reportedly wrongly positioned ahead of major central bank decisions; smaller London-based macro funds also experienced losses estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
- • Federal Reserve hiked rates for the first time in three years amid resurgent inflation, while the Bank of England held steady but signaled future rate increases, creating an environment where macro positioning proved costly for unprepared funds.
- • JPMorgan's fixed income and equities trading revenues demonstrated "broad-based strength" in Q3 2025, contrasting sharply with softened FICC trading revenues at Bank of America and Goldman Sachs, underscoring divergent performance across major banks' trading operations.
- • Rising US Treasury yields are structurally pressuring hedge fund returns, with Citadel CEO Ken Griffin noting in May that investors now demand returns equivalent to the risk-free rate plus 4%—a threshold that current market conditions make difficult for many macro funds to achieve.
- • Historical macro fund volatility persists, with precedent established in March 2025 when funds like Caxton, Taula, and Brevan Howard's Master Fund fell 15%, 9.6%, and 6% respectively, though some recovered partially by August.
Summary
This December volatility mirrors earlier disruption in March 2025, when geopolitical escalation in Iran triggered significant losses across the sector. Caxton declined 15%, Taula fell 9.6%, and Brevan Howard's Master Fund dropped 6% that month. While some funds recovered—with Brevan Howard's Master Fund posting a 3.7% gain through May and other funds showing partial recovery by August—the recurrence of large losses demonstrates persistent vulnerability in macro strategy execution during periods of rapid policy transition.
The structural headwinds facing macro funds have intensified as US Treasury yields climbed, reducing the attractiveness of hedge fund allocations relative to risk-free returns. Ken Griffin, CEO of Citadel, articulated the investor threshold in May 2025: allocators now demand returns equivalent to the risk-free rate of capital plus 4%. With risk-free rates elevated, funds generating returns below 8% face significant redemption pressure and difficulty attracting fresh capital, raising performance hurdles across the industry.
Banking sector performance diverged sharply during the same period. JPMorgan reported broad-based strength across fixed income, currencies, and commodities (FICC) and equities trading in Q3 2025, with CEO Douglas Petno emphasizing robust results. In contrast, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs both reported softened fixed income trading revenues compared to the first half of 2025, suggesting uneven revenue distribution as market conditions favored certain trading desks and institutions over others.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.