Key Takeaways
- • Tri-State Defender endorsement: The historically African American newspaper endorsed incumbent U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen over former Memphis Mayor Willie Herenton in Tennessee's 9th Congressional District Democratic primary, citing Cohen's superior diplomatic and collaborative capabilities for addressing community policy needs.
- • Primary outcome: Cohen advanced to the November general election after defeating his Democratic primary challenger, positioning him to defend his House seat against a Republican opponent in the general election.
- • Editorial rationale: Publisher Bernal Smith stated the endorsement centered on leadership competency rather than race, emphasizing that Cohen demonstrated stronger potential to bring "diplomacy," "statesmanship," and "collaborative effort" necessary for effective policy change in the district.
- • Voter sentiment divided: Community reaction to the newspaper's endorsement of a white candidate over a black candidate was mixed, with some voters questioning whether the publication should take sides, while others supported the editorial board's substantive policy-based decision.
Summary
The newspaper's publisher, Bernal Smith, framed the editorial decision as merit-based rather than identity-based. Smith emphasized that while Herenton had accomplished much during his tenure as mayor, the editorial board determined that Cohen possessed superior qualifications to serve as congressman. According to Smith, the endorsement hinged on identifying "who understands and can bring leadership to address those ills that our community faces," with success dependent on an individual's capacity to deliver "diplomacy," "statesmanship," and "collaborative effort" necessary for meaningful policy change.
Cohen ultimately advanced to the November general election after winning the Democratic primary against his challenger. He will face a Republican opponent in the general election to defend his House seat.
Community reaction to the Tri-State Defender's endorsement proved mixed. Some voters questioned whether a newspaper should take an explicit stance in electoral races, preferring that media outlets report facts and allow constituents to decide independently. Other voters, however, supported the editorial board's substantive approach, crediting the newspaper for making a principled stand based on candidate qualifications rather than demographic considerations. A subset of Memphis residents referenced the primary opponent's invocation of racial issues as a negative factor influencing their voting preferences.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.