Key Takeaways
- • Hedge fund stockpickers delivered 1.5% returns in July and have posted 7.8% year-to-date gains, buoyed by rising equity markets and record highs in the S&P 500, according to Goldman Sachs analysis.
- • Systematic hedge funds experienced their worst monthly performance on record before a rebound on July 25, finishing July down 2% but maintaining a 10% year-to-date gain, illustrating divergent performance between quantitative and fundamental strategies.
- • Large multi-strategy funds posted muted returns: Schonfeld Strategic Advisors' flagship Strategic Partners fund declined 0.3% in July (up 5.8% YTD), while Marshall Wace's Market Neutral TOPS fund returned negative 0.2% in July but achieved 11% for the first half of 2025.
- • Individual fund performance varied significantly across the industry, with Citadel Wellington Fund gaining 1.3% in July, Brevan Howard Alpha Strategies declining 0.4%, and CFM funds ranging from flat to 0.9% returns, reflecting varied exposure to volatile U.S. trade dynamics and crowded equity positioning.
- • The divergence between stockpickers and systematic traders underscores a key market dynamic: fundamental strategies benefited from crowded trades and rising equities, while algorithm-based strategies were penalized by the same concentration of positioning.
Summary
Hedge funds posted mixed results in July 2025, with equity-focused strategies capitalizing on rising stock markets and record highs, though algorithmic traders faced headwinds from concentrated positioning and U.S. trade uncertainty. According to Goldman Sachs analysis, equity stockpickers returned nearly 1.5% in July and have extended year-to-date gains to approximately 7.8%, benefiting from broad market strength despite the S&P 500's more modest 1.38% monthly return.
The performance divergence between investment approaches was stark. Systematic hedge funds—those relying on algorithmic and quantitative trading strategies—experienced their worst monthly performance on record before staging a dramatic recovery on July 25. These funds ended July with a negative 2% return but have still achieved a 10% year-to-date gain, indicating that earlier months offset July's turbulence. The underperformance reflects how crowded trades and algorithmic positioning created mutual headwinds for systematic strategies, in contrast to fundamental stockpickers who benefited from the same concentrated equity positioning.
Large multi-strategy platforms delivered subdued returns. Schonfeld Strategic Advisors' flagship Strategic Partners fund declined 0.3% in July, bringing its year-to-date performance to 5.8%, while its Fundamental Equity fund performed better with a 1.4% July gain and 7.1% year-to-date result. Marshall Wace, the $76.9 billion London-based fund manager, reported a negative 0.2% return in its Market Neutral TOPS fund in July but achieved approximately 11% for the first half of 2025. The firm's Eureka fund returned 1.6% in July and is up 6.1% year-to-date.
Across major funds, performance remained varied. Citadel Wellington Fund posted a 1.3% July return, while Brevan Howard Alpha Strategies declined 0.4%. CFM's suite of funds delivered mixed results, with CFM Discus returning 0.9%, CFM Stratus flat at 0.0%, and CFM Cumulus up 0.3%. The divergence reflects the market's underlying complexity—while rising equity markets supported long-biased strategies, U.S. trade uncertainty and tactical positioning challenges created volatility that impacted more specialized and quantitative approaches throughout the month.
The performance divergence between investment approaches was stark. Systematic hedge funds—those relying on algorithmic and quantitative trading strategies—experienced their worst monthly performance on record before staging a dramatic recovery on July 25. These funds ended July with a negative 2% return but have still achieved a 10% year-to-date gain, indicating that earlier months offset July's turbulence. The underperformance reflects how crowded trades and algorithmic positioning created mutual headwinds for systematic strategies, in contrast to fundamental stockpickers who benefited from the same concentrated equity positioning.
Large multi-strategy platforms delivered subdued returns. Schonfeld Strategic Advisors' flagship Strategic Partners fund declined 0.3% in July, bringing its year-to-date performance to 5.8%, while its Fundamental Equity fund performed better with a 1.4% July gain and 7.1% year-to-date result. Marshall Wace, the $76.9 billion London-based fund manager, reported a negative 0.2% return in its Market Neutral TOPS fund in July but achieved approximately 11% for the first half of 2025. The firm's Eureka fund returned 1.6% in July and is up 6.1% year-to-date.
Across major funds, performance remained varied. Citadel Wellington Fund posted a 1.3% July return, while Brevan Howard Alpha Strategies declined 0.4%. CFM's suite of funds delivered mixed results, with CFM Discus returning 0.9%, CFM Stratus flat at 0.0%, and CFM Cumulus up 0.3%. The divergence reflects the market's underlying complexity—while rising equity markets supported long-biased strategies, U.S. trade uncertainty and tactical positioning challenges created volatility that impacted more specialized and quantitative approaches throughout the month.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.