Key Takeaways
- • Rokos Capital Management posted a 2.1% gain in March 2026, bringing year-to-date returns to 4.7%, outperforming peers as the London-based $22 billion macro hedge fund benefited from winning positions in foreign exchange, commodities, and fixed income amid geopolitical turmoil.
- • Kepos Capital's Alpha fund and Two Seas Capital were among notable winners during March's hedge fund selloff, which was triggered by escalating Middle East conflict and resulting energy price shocks that decimated most macro and equity strategies.
- • The broader hedge fund industry suffered significant losses in March, with several high-profile macro managers including Said Haidar, Diego Megia, and Edouard de Langlade posting negative returns, while Brevan Howard Master Fund experienced its steepest monthly decline since inception.
- • Risk management and tactical positioning in energy-related assets proved decisive during March's market turmoil, with winners demonstrating superior execution across volatile commodity and currency markets while energy shocks reshaped inflation and interest rate expectations.
- • Performance divergence was extreme across the hedge fund landscape, with commodities-focused and quantitative strategies posting strong gains while equity and multi-strategy funds experienced mixed results depending on geopolitical exposure and portfolio construction.
Summary
Rokos was not alone in posting gains during the turbulent month. Kepos Capital's Alpha fund and Two Seas Capital also navigated the March decline successfully, distinguishing themselves from peers who faced significant drawdowns. In contrast, the broader macro hedge fund community experienced widespread losses, with several established discretionary macro managers recording negative performance. Notable underperformers included strategies managed by Said Haidar, Diego Megia, and Edouard de Langlade, while Brevan Howard Master Fund posted its steepest monthly decline since the fund's inception.
The March selloff was primarily catalyzed by escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, which triggered substantial energy price increases and disrupted global markets. These energy shocks reverberated through inflation expectations and interest rate outlooks, forcing traders to rapidly recalibrate their positioning and macro assumptions regarding economic growth implications from the ongoing conflict. The combination of these factors created a challenging environment for most asset allocations, particularly for equity hedge funds and traditional multi-strategy managers.
The disparity in March performance highlighted the critical importance of risk management and tactical positioning in volatile markets. Funds that successfully hedged geopolitical exposure and maintained disciplined risk protocols generated positive returns, while those with elevated sensitivity to energy and equity market shocks sustained losses. Certain quantitative and systematic strategies also demonstrated resilience, though systematic funds faced pressure across the board. The stark performance bifurcation underscores how differentiated execution and directional thesis quality determined outcomes during periods of macroeconomic dislocation driven by supply-side shocks and geopolitical events.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.