Key Takeaways
- • The Managed Funds Association (MFA) endorsed the SEC's Custody Rule proposal as a necessary modernization that addresses long-standing regulatory ambiguities affecting private fund managers and custodians.
- • MFA specifically welcomed the proposal's clarification on three critical operational areas: private market investments, discretionary trading authority, and digital asset custody.
- • The industry group emphasized that the proposed amendments maintain investor protection safeguards while adapting the regulatory framework to reflect current market structure and practices.
- • MFA represents over 180 fund manager members globally managing hedge funds, private credit vehicles, and hybrid strategies serving institutional investors including pension funds, endowments, and foundations.
Summary
The Managed Funds Association issued a statement supporting the SEC's proposed amendments to the Custody Rule, characterizing the regulatory initiative as an overdue modernization of standards governing asset safeguarding for alternative investment managers. Jennifer Han, MFA's Chief Legal Officer, stated that the Commission's effort addresses "longstanding issues with the Custody Rule that have created uncertainty for investment advisers," signaling that existing regulations have created operational friction for the industry.
The proposal targets three specific areas requiring regulatory clarity: private market investments, discretionary trading practices, and digital asset custody arrangements. These operational domains have grown increasingly complex as alternative asset managers expand beyond traditional equity and fixed-income holdings into illiquid investments and blockchain-based assets. MFA's explicit endorsement of clarity in these areas reflects industry demand for updated guidance that reflects market evolution since the rule's original formulation.
Notably, MFA framed its support within a dual mandate: modernization coupled with maintenance of investor protection standards. This positioning suggests the industry recognizes regulatory scrutiny around custody arrangements while seeking relief from prescriptive rules designed for legacy market structures. The statement commits MFA to "working with the Commission on a modernized framework," indicating the industry group intends an active role in the regulatory process leading to final rule adoption.
MFA represents the institutional foundation of the global alternative asset industry, with membership exceeding 180 fund managers deploying diverse strategies across hedge funds, private credit, and hybrid structures. These managers collectively serve substantial institutional capital from public pension systems, charitable endowments, foundations, and other long-term investors dependent on alternative returns for portfolio diversification and risk-adjusted performance.
The proposal targets three specific areas requiring regulatory clarity: private market investments, discretionary trading practices, and digital asset custody arrangements. These operational domains have grown increasingly complex as alternative asset managers expand beyond traditional equity and fixed-income holdings into illiquid investments and blockchain-based assets. MFA's explicit endorsement of clarity in these areas reflects industry demand for updated guidance that reflects market evolution since the rule's original formulation.
Notably, MFA framed its support within a dual mandate: modernization coupled with maintenance of investor protection standards. This positioning suggests the industry recognizes regulatory scrutiny around custody arrangements while seeking relief from prescriptive rules designed for legacy market structures. The statement commits MFA to "working with the Commission on a modernized framework," indicating the industry group intends an active role in the regulatory process leading to final rule adoption.
MFA represents the institutional foundation of the global alternative asset industry, with membership exceeding 180 fund managers deploying diverse strategies across hedge funds, private credit, and hybrid structures. These managers collectively serve substantial institutional capital from public pension systems, charitable endowments, foundations, and other long-term investors dependent on alternative returns for portfolio diversification and risk-adjusted performance.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.