Key Takeaways
- • Scott Goodwin, co-founder of Diameter Capital Partners, publicly warned at the May 12 Sohn Investment Conference that artificial intelligence would "ruthlessly eliminate" software companies, positioning the hedge fund ahead of a broader market correction in SaaS equities.
- • Hedge funds are dumping SaaS stock exposure at the fastest pace since 2008, according to Goldman Sachs analysis, signaling a significant repricing of software valuations across the sector.
- • Goodwin is opportunistically deploying capital to buy into the panic selling, indicating conviction that current depressed valuations present attractive entry points for contrarian investors.
- • The SaaS sector correction reflects broader Wall Street anxiety about AI disruption to traditional software business models, particularly concerns around per-seat pricing viability and the shift toward API-based architectures.
- • The timing of Goodwin's public positioning at a major institutional investor conference suggests Diameter Capital is leveraging first-mover advantage in identifying and capitalizing on SaaS market dislocations.
Summary
Scott Goodwin, co-founder of the hedge fund Diameter Capital Partners, emerged as a prescient voice on artificial intelligence's disruptive impact on the software sector, warning investors well before consensus shifted toward sector skepticism. Speaking at the Sohn Investment Conference on May 12, 2026—a prestigious annual gathering of institutional investors held at Lincoln Center—Goodwin articulated a thesis that AI would "ruthlessly eliminate" software companies, a prediction that has proven increasingly relevant as the market has repriced SaaS equities downward.
The broader market context underscores the significance of Goodwin's early positioning. According to Goldman Sachs analysis, hedge funds are currently divesting SaaS stock exposure at the fastest rate since the 2008 financial crisis, reflecting a fundamental reassessment of software valuations and business model sustainability. This sector-wide exodus suggests that institutional investors increasingly share concerns about AI's capacity to disintermediate traditional software vendors, particularly those reliant on per-seat licensing models and legacy pricing structures.
Rather than retreating from the sector entirely, Goodwin has adopted a contrarian posture, actively purchasing SaaS equities as panic selling intensifies. This capital deployment strategy reflects confidence that current market dislocations have created attractive risk-reward dynamics for investors with conviction and adequate liquidity. By presenting this thesis publicly at a major institutional forum, Diameter Capital has signaled both its analytical edge and its willingness to deploy significant capital during periods of acute market stress—a positioning that could generate substantial returns if the sector stabilizes or rebounds.
The market dynamics at play reflect deeper structural questions about software economics in an AI-native environment. Wall Street anxiety extends beyond SaaS specifically to encompass broader concerns about private credit markets and capital allocation in a period of significant technological disruption. Goodwin's emphasis on the AI elimination thesis and his subsequent opportunistic buying suggest that sophisticated investors are beginning to differentiate between structurally challenged software vendors and those positioned to benefit from or adapt to AI-driven transformation.
The broader market context underscores the significance of Goodwin's early positioning. According to Goldman Sachs analysis, hedge funds are currently divesting SaaS stock exposure at the fastest rate since the 2008 financial crisis, reflecting a fundamental reassessment of software valuations and business model sustainability. This sector-wide exodus suggests that institutional investors increasingly share concerns about AI's capacity to disintermediate traditional software vendors, particularly those reliant on per-seat licensing models and legacy pricing structures.
Rather than retreating from the sector entirely, Goodwin has adopted a contrarian posture, actively purchasing SaaS equities as panic selling intensifies. This capital deployment strategy reflects confidence that current market dislocations have created attractive risk-reward dynamics for investors with conviction and adequate liquidity. By presenting this thesis publicly at a major institutional forum, Diameter Capital has signaled both its analytical edge and its willingness to deploy significant capital during periods of acute market stress—a positioning that could generate substantial returns if the sector stabilizes or rebounds.
The market dynamics at play reflect deeper structural questions about software economics in an AI-native environment. Wall Street anxiety extends beyond SaaS specifically to encompass broader concerns about private credit markets and capital allocation in a period of significant technological disruption. Goodwin's emphasis on the AI elimination thesis and his subsequent opportunistic buying suggest that sophisticated investors are beginning to differentiate between structurally challenged software vendors and those positioned to benefit from or adapt to AI-driven transformation.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.