Key Takeaways
- • Large university endowments with assets exceeding $1 billion averaged 11.5% returns in fiscal 2025, yet systematically underperformed broader market benchmarks despite positive absolute returns.
- • Elite institutions demonstrated significant variance in performance: Brown University generated a 52% return, University of Pennsylvania achieved 41%, and Washington University posted notable gains, while larger endowments with $50B+ in assets returned approximately 9.6% in fiscal 2024.
- • Fiscal year 2024 endowment returns averaged 11.2%, with FY25 averaging 10.9%, indicating moderation in performance and raising questions about return assumptions in institutional financial planning.
- • The underperformance gap persists despite substantial allocation to alternative investments and sophisticated portfolio construction, suggesting structural challenges in endowment investment strategy relative to passive market exposure.
- • Endowment reliance on investment returns is growing while return expectations are moderating, forcing institutions to reassess assumptions and confront the sustainability of current spending and financial aid commitments.
Summary
University endowments returned to growth in fiscal 2025, with the average endowment holding at least $1 billion in assets posting an 11.5% return. However, this seemingly robust performance masks a persistent underperformance problem relative to broader market benchmarks. According to available research, large U.S. college and university endowments have repeatedly fallen short of their self-imposed performance targets and market indices despite maintaining sophisticated, diversified portfolios weighted toward alternative investments.
Fiscal performance varied considerably across elite institutions. Brown University's endowment generated a striking 52% return, while the University of Pennsylvania achieved 41% returns—both substantially above the peer average. However, larger endowments tell a different story. Those with assets exceeding $50 billion returned approximately 9.6% in fiscal 2024, generating substantial absolute dollar gains (one $50B+ endowment produced $2.5 billion in returns) while still underperforming relevant benchmarks. This performance disparity raises critical questions about the effectiveness of scale and complexity in endowment management.
Historical performance data reveals a cooling trend. Fiscal year 2024 endowment returns averaged 11.2%, declining modestly to 10.9% in FY25, indicating that the tailwind from recent market recovery may be moderating. Simultaneously, institutional endowment reliance is growing while return expectations are normalizing downward. This creates a structural pressure point: as spending demands increase and return assumptions moderate, many institutions must reassess long-term financial sustainability.
The underperformance problem is particularly acute given endowments' purported advantages—professional management, substantial capital allocation to private equity and alternative assets, and multi-decade investment horizons. Yet these endowments consistently lag passive benchmarks, suggesting that fee drag, opportunity cost, and concentrated positioning in illiquid alternatives may outweigh perceived advantages. Market volatility compounds the challenge, as endowments remain susceptible to equity market shocks despite diversification efforts.
For institutional investors and fiduciaries evaluating endowment performance, the data suggests a fundamental reckoning: larger, more complex endowment portfolios are not reliably delivering alpha sufficient to justify their complexity or justify elevated return assumptions used in financial planning.
Fiscal performance varied considerably across elite institutions. Brown University's endowment generated a striking 52% return, while the University of Pennsylvania achieved 41% returns—both substantially above the peer average. However, larger endowments tell a different story. Those with assets exceeding $50 billion returned approximately 9.6% in fiscal 2024, generating substantial absolute dollar gains (one $50B+ endowment produced $2.5 billion in returns) while still underperforming relevant benchmarks. This performance disparity raises critical questions about the effectiveness of scale and complexity in endowment management.
Historical performance data reveals a cooling trend. Fiscal year 2024 endowment returns averaged 11.2%, declining modestly to 10.9% in FY25, indicating that the tailwind from recent market recovery may be moderating. Simultaneously, institutional endowment reliance is growing while return expectations are normalizing downward. This creates a structural pressure point: as spending demands increase and return assumptions moderate, many institutions must reassess long-term financial sustainability.
The underperformance problem is particularly acute given endowments' purported advantages—professional management, substantial capital allocation to private equity and alternative assets, and multi-decade investment horizons. Yet these endowments consistently lag passive benchmarks, suggesting that fee drag, opportunity cost, and concentrated positioning in illiquid alternatives may outweigh perceived advantages. Market volatility compounds the challenge, as endowments remain susceptible to equity market shocks despite diversification efforts.
For institutional investors and fiduciaries evaluating endowment performance, the data suggests a fundamental reckoning: larger, more complex endowment portfolios are not reliably delivering alpha sufficient to justify their complexity or justify elevated return assumptions used in financial planning.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.