Key Takeaways
- • Family offices allocated 40% to alternatives in 2025 (per Goldman Sachs), with hedge fund allocations remaining modest at 6% average since 2023, suggesting significant underutilization of quantitative strategies like trend-following.
- • Trend-following strategies delivered +27.35% via the Soc Gen Trend Index in 2022 while the S&P 500 declined 20.28%, demonstrating "crisis alpha" performance during market stress periods.
- • Trend-following funds exhibit the lowest correlation to major asset classes while generating equity-like long-term returns, making them directionally agnostic performers across growth and recession scenarios.
- • Charles Bamford of Fairlight Capital Partners argues trend-following represents an under-deployed hedge fund category that family offices should expand, offering liquid diversified alpha sources compared to illiquid alternatives dominating current allocations (private equity, real estate, infrastructure).
- • Private credit is positioned to overtake hedge funds in family office preference, with 25% of family offices intending to increase allocations, despite trend-following's documented portfolio diversification and drawdown reduction benefits.
Summary
Family offices worldwide are significantly underweighting hedge funds despite compelling evidence that trend-following strategies could enhance portfolio resilience. According to Goldman Sachs data cited in the analysis, alternatives represented 40% of family office allocations in 2025, dominated by private equity, private real estate, and infrastructure. However, hedge fund allocations averaged just 6% since 2023—a modest figure that Charles Bamford of Fairlight Capital Partners characterizes as a missed opportunity for accessing liquid diversified alpha sources.
The performance differential between trend-following strategies and traditional equity markets during volatile periods illustrates the case for broader adoption. In 2022, the Soc Gen Trend Index delivered +27.35% returns while the S&P 500 fell 20.28%, exemplifying what industry participants term "crisis alpha." This pattern reflects trend-following's fundamental characteristic: strategies are directionally agnostic, capable of generating alpha in both growth and recessionary environments by systematically capturing price momentum across asset classes with minimal correlation to major indices.
Family offices have historically been positioned as patient capital comfortable with illiquidity, often deploying directly into private markets where they maintain operational expertise. However, the emerging preference for private credit—with 25% of family offices planning to increase allocations—suggests a structural shift toward illiquid strategies. Bamford's argument centers on the complementary role quantitative hedge funds could play: providing liquid, systematic diversification tools that reduce portfolio drawdowns while delivering equity-like long-term returns without the lock-up constraints of private markets.
The strategic implication is straightforward for allocators seeking portfolio optimization. Trend-following methodologies, which trace their systematic roots to the 1800s, offer documented benefits in lowering portfolio volatility and enhancing risk-adjusted returns through genuine diversification rather than exposure to correlated private markets. Given their proven performance during market dislocations and low correlation to contemporary portfolio holdings, these strategies warrant reconsideration within family office asset allocation frameworks.
The performance differential between trend-following strategies and traditional equity markets during volatile periods illustrates the case for broader adoption. In 2022, the Soc Gen Trend Index delivered +27.35% returns while the S&P 500 fell 20.28%, exemplifying what industry participants term "crisis alpha." This pattern reflects trend-following's fundamental characteristic: strategies are directionally agnostic, capable of generating alpha in both growth and recessionary environments by systematically capturing price momentum across asset classes with minimal correlation to major indices.
Family offices have historically been positioned as patient capital comfortable with illiquidity, often deploying directly into private markets where they maintain operational expertise. However, the emerging preference for private credit—with 25% of family offices planning to increase allocations—suggests a structural shift toward illiquid strategies. Bamford's argument centers on the complementary role quantitative hedge funds could play: providing liquid, systematic diversification tools that reduce portfolio drawdowns while delivering equity-like long-term returns without the lock-up constraints of private markets.
The strategic implication is straightforward for allocators seeking portfolio optimization. Trend-following methodologies, which trace their systematic roots to the 1800s, offer documented benefits in lowering portfolio volatility and enhancing risk-adjusted returns through genuine diversification rather than exposure to correlated private markets. Given their proven performance during market dislocations and low correlation to contemporary portfolio holdings, these strategies warrant reconsideration within family office asset allocation frameworks.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.