Key Takeaways
- • Style factors, not manager skill alone, drive annual performance dispersion among trend-following CTAs: Volatility targets, speed of execution, and sector exposures explain most year-to-year performance differences, according to research by Steben & Company.
- • Trend following dominates the managed futures landscape: The strategy exploits momentum across more than 200 global futures markets—commodities, equities, fixed income, and currencies—by taking long positions in rising markets and short positions in falling markets.
- • Top quartile performance lacks persistence among managed futures managers: Despite conceptual similarity in trading programs, CTAs demonstrate inconsistent ability to maintain superior returns across multiple periods, indicating that annual style factors overshadow long-term competitive advantages.
- • Long-term manager differentiation hinges on research quality and risk management: Managers with stronger focus on research, risk management, and trade execution demonstrate better performance over multiple market cycles, even though single-year results are dominated by style factors rather than skill differences.
- • Managed futures serve institutional portfolios seeking diversification: The asset class has gained adoption among investors targeting absolute returns independent of broad equity and bond market directions.
Summary
Managed futures have emerged as a widely adopted alternative asset class for institutional investors seeking portfolio diversification and absolute returns uncorrelated with traditional equity and bond markets. According to research released by alternative investment managers Steben & Company, the category has attracted significant capital precisely because it offers exposure to momentum-driven strategies operating across global markets.
Trend following represents the dominant managed futures strategy, accounting for the majority of capital deployed in the space. The approach exploits momentum by simultaneously trading in excess of 200 global futures markets spanning commodities, equities, fixed income, and currencies. Practitioners execute this strategy by establishing long positions in appreciating markets and short positions in declining ones, creating a systematic framework designed to capture directional moves across asset classes.
A critical finding from the Steben research addresses a persistent puzzle in the industry: why do trend-following commodity trading advisors (CTAs) exhibit such substantial performance dispersion despite operating from conceptually similar trading programs? The study identifies style factors—specifically volatility targets, execution speed, and sector exposures—as the primary drivers of short-term performance differences among managers. These structural choices, rather than underlying manager skill or competitive "edge," explain the majority of annual performance variation.
The research also reveals an uncomfortable truth for performance-chasing investors: there is minimal persistence in top quartile returns among CTAs. However, this finding does not negate the existence of meaningful long-term manager differentiation. Managers demonstrating stronger commitment to research rigor, disciplined risk management, and precise trade execution tend to generate superior returns when measured across multiple market cycles. The implication is that while style factors dominate single-year outcomes, fundamental differences in operational sophistication manifest over extended periods.
For institutional allocators, the research suggests that evaluating managed futures managers requires distinguishing between temporary style-driven performance variations and durable competitive advantages rooted in systematic excellence. Single-year performance rankings should be interpreted with caution, while long-term track records reflecting multiple market regimes offer more reliable insight into manager quality and operational capability.
Trend following represents the dominant managed futures strategy, accounting for the majority of capital deployed in the space. The approach exploits momentum by simultaneously trading in excess of 200 global futures markets spanning commodities, equities, fixed income, and currencies. Practitioners execute this strategy by establishing long positions in appreciating markets and short positions in declining ones, creating a systematic framework designed to capture directional moves across asset classes.
A critical finding from the Steben research addresses a persistent puzzle in the industry: why do trend-following commodity trading advisors (CTAs) exhibit such substantial performance dispersion despite operating from conceptually similar trading programs? The study identifies style factors—specifically volatility targets, execution speed, and sector exposures—as the primary drivers of short-term performance differences among managers. These structural choices, rather than underlying manager skill or competitive "edge," explain the majority of annual performance variation.
The research also reveals an uncomfortable truth for performance-chasing investors: there is minimal persistence in top quartile returns among CTAs. However, this finding does not negate the existence of meaningful long-term manager differentiation. Managers demonstrating stronger commitment to research rigor, disciplined risk management, and precise trade execution tend to generate superior returns when measured across multiple market cycles. The implication is that while style factors dominate single-year outcomes, fundamental differences in operational sophistication manifest over extended periods.
For institutional allocators, the research suggests that evaluating managed futures managers requires distinguishing between temporary style-driven performance variations and durable competitive advantages rooted in systematic excellence. Single-year performance rankings should be interpreted with caution, while long-term track records reflecting multiple market regimes offer more reliable insight into manager quality and operational capability.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.