Key Takeaways
- • Trend following's competitive edge has shifted rather than disappeared, with systematic investors needing to reconsider how markets function as complex adaptive systems rather than equilibrium-seeking machines, according to research presented by Niels Kaastrup-Larsen and Richard Brennan.
- • Markets exhibit structural features including outsized trends and outliers that are inherent to their design, not anomalies; understanding these characteristics is critical for systematic trend-following strategies to remain effective.
- • Backtests should be interpreted as evidence of historical performance patterns rather than guarantees of future results, with particular emphasis on avoiding premature profit-taking that can prove costly in sustained trending environments.
- • Reflexivity and increasing returns mechanisms—where market participant behavior reinforces directional moves—create self-reinforcing trend dynamics that reward responsive rather than purely predictive investment approaches.
- • Three years of focused research by DUNN Capital revealed that trend following's alpha generation mechanisms remain viable when investors properly account for market complexity and participant-driven dynamics rather than mechanical equilibrium assumptions.
Summary
In Episode 418 of "Top Traders Unplugged" (September 19, 2026), Niels Kaastrup-Larsen and Richard Brennan examined how complexity science and adaptive systems theory provide a more accurate framework for understanding market behavior than traditional equilibrium models. Drawing on research from the Santa Fe Institute, the discussion centered on why systematic investors—particularly trend followers—should reconceptualize markets as living, evolving systems shaped by participant behavior rather than mechanical structures gravitating toward equilibrium.
The core thesis challenges a prevailing assumption in institutional investing: that trend following's historical outperformance edge has simply disappeared. Rather, Brennan argues the edge has migrated, requiring practitioners to adapt their analytical frameworks. Three years of DUNN Capital research revealed that big trends and outliers are not statistical aberrations but structural features of markets. This distinction matters significantly for systematic managers, as it reframes how to assess backtest results and set expectations for forward performance. Brennan emphasized that backtests function as evidence of historical dynamics rather than promises, a critical nuance for fiduciaries evaluating strategy robustness.
The conversation examined two powerful mechanisms driving self-reinforcing market movements: reflexivity and increasing returns. In these environments, market participant responses to price action create feedback loops that extend trends beyond what fundamental analysis alone would predict. Brennan specifically addressed a tactical pitfall among trend followers: taking profits prematurely during sustained moves. Early exits can prove costly when reflexive dynamics are still actively amplifying directional flows, underscoring the importance of responding to actual market behavior rather than attempting to predict inflection points.
This framework—treating markets as complex adaptive systems—offers institutional investors a pathway to reconcile trend following's continued relevance with the observable evolution of market microstructure and participant dynamics over time.
The core thesis challenges a prevailing assumption in institutional investing: that trend following's historical outperformance edge has simply disappeared. Rather, Brennan argues the edge has migrated, requiring practitioners to adapt their analytical frameworks. Three years of DUNN Capital research revealed that big trends and outliers are not statistical aberrations but structural features of markets. This distinction matters significantly for systematic managers, as it reframes how to assess backtest results and set expectations for forward performance. Brennan emphasized that backtests function as evidence of historical dynamics rather than promises, a critical nuance for fiduciaries evaluating strategy robustness.
The conversation examined two powerful mechanisms driving self-reinforcing market movements: reflexivity and increasing returns. In these environments, market participant responses to price action create feedback loops that extend trends beyond what fundamental analysis alone would predict. Brennan specifically addressed a tactical pitfall among trend followers: taking profits prematurely during sustained moves. Early exits can prove costly when reflexive dynamics are still actively amplifying directional flows, underscoring the importance of responding to actual market behavior rather than attempting to predict inflection points.
This framework—treating markets as complex adaptive systems—offers institutional investors a pathway to reconcile trend following's continued relevance with the observable evolution of market microstructure and participant dynamics over time.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.