Key Takeaways
- • ASIC reviewed 24 private credit funds managing a combined $18 billion and found many products complex and lacking clear disclosure on risks, underlying assets, fees and conflicts of interest.
- • ASIC found nine of 12 reviewed retail funds failed to clearly explain information critical to investment decisions, including exposure to non-performing or distressed assets.
- • Ten of 12 retail funds had poorly designed target market determinations (TMDs), with broad or unclear risk ratings and inappropriate allocation recommendations.
- • ASIC says financial advisers generally acted in clients' best interests, but flagged some who recommended large single-fund allocations despite financial incentive arrangements with fund operators.
- • ASIC commissioner Simone Constant said the regulator will increase scrutiny, release updated guidance for managed funds using private credit strategies, and work with industry bodies on standards.
Summary
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has warned that many private credit funds continue to fall short on disclosure, distribution and conflict-management practices, despite a major ASIC review raising the same concerns a year earlier. The regulator examined 24 private credit funds managing a combined $18 billion and found many products were complex, difficult to understand, and lacked clear disclosure around risks, underlying assets, fees and conflicts of interest, according to the article's account of the ASIC report.
ASIC identified "prevalent" and "material shortcomings" in marketing materials, disclosure documents and target market determinations. The regulator said investors were being distributed products "without the benefit of disclosures to help them clearly understand what they are investing in and what risk they are taking." ASIC warned that harm to retail investors and superannuation funds could "damage general market confidence and cause harm to sectors of firms and consumers."
The retail segment drew particular concern. Among the retail funds reviewed, which included the Bentham Syndicated Loan Fund, Trilogy Monthly Income Trust and Skyring Fixed Income Fund, nine of 12 failed to clearly explain critical investment information, including exposure to non-performing or distressed assets. Ten of 12 retail funds had poorly designed target market determinations. Wholesale funds reviewed included the Apollo Asset Backed Credit Trust, GCI Real Estate Credit Fund and iPartners Property Credit Fund.
On adviser conduct, ASIC said advisers generally demonstrated they were acting in clients' best interests, with private credit typically representing a modest portion of diversified fixed-income allocations. However, the regulator identified some advisers recommending large allocations to a single fund while holding financial incentive arrangements with fund operators.
ASIC commissioner Simone Constant acknowledged "pockets of improvement" but said "complexity and opacity persist." The regulator plans to increase scrutiny, release updated guidance for managed funds using private credit strategies, and work with industry bodies to strengthen standards across retail and wholesale funds. Constant called for "urgent action from all involved in the private credit system."
ASIC identified "prevalent" and "material shortcomings" in marketing materials, disclosure documents and target market determinations. The regulator said investors were being distributed products "without the benefit of disclosures to help them clearly understand what they are investing in and what risk they are taking." ASIC warned that harm to retail investors and superannuation funds could "damage general market confidence and cause harm to sectors of firms and consumers."
The retail segment drew particular concern. Among the retail funds reviewed, which included the Bentham Syndicated Loan Fund, Trilogy Monthly Income Trust and Skyring Fixed Income Fund, nine of 12 failed to clearly explain critical investment information, including exposure to non-performing or distressed assets. Ten of 12 retail funds had poorly designed target market determinations. Wholesale funds reviewed included the Apollo Asset Backed Credit Trust, GCI Real Estate Credit Fund and iPartners Property Credit Fund.
On adviser conduct, ASIC said advisers generally demonstrated they were acting in clients' best interests, with private credit typically representing a modest portion of diversified fixed-income allocations. However, the regulator identified some advisers recommending large allocations to a single fund while holding financial incentive arrangements with fund operators.
ASIC commissioner Simone Constant acknowledged "pockets of improvement" but said "complexity and opacity persist." The regulator plans to increase scrutiny, release updated guidance for managed funds using private credit strategies, and work with industry bodies to strengthen standards across retail and wholesale funds. Constant called for "urgent action from all involved in the private credit system."
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.