Key Takeaways
- • Blue Owl received redemption requests of as much as 38 percent from a private credit fund focused on software and technology companies, according to the New York Times, with a second, larger fund seeing 19 percent of investor money seek to leave.
- • The redemption figures were only marginally lower than the prior quarter's 41 percent and 22 percent, despite a global effort by Blue Owl executives over recent months to keep investors in the firm.
- • Blue Owl co-CEO Marc Lipschultz had said in late May that the industry's "freak out" moment had passed, a view the latest results appear to contradict.
- • The private credit industry, now estimated at roughly $3 trillion by some metrics, is facing sustained investor concern over the soundness of its loans.
Summary
The private credit industry's effort to calm investor concerns about loan quality has not yet succeeded, according to the New York Times. Blue Owl's latest quarterly results, released on Thursday, showed investors continuing to pull capital. Requests to withdraw reached as much as 38 percent of one private credit fund focused on software and technology companies, while 19 percent of investor money sought to leave a second, larger fund.
The figures were barely lower than the prior quarter, when redemption requests reached 41 percent and 22 percent for the two funds. The results came despite a global effort by Blue Owl executives over the past few months to persuade backers to remain with the firm. In late May, Blue Owl co-chief executive Marc Lipschultz said the industry's "freak out" moment had passed, a statement the latest withdrawal data does not support.
The Times notes that private credit was once among the most admired segments of the financial world. Often described as a rebranding of the high-yield "junk bonds" of the 1980s and 1990s, the asset class grew rapidly after the 2008 financial crisis, partly because regulations discouraged banks from making high-interest loans. A new group of firms emerged to raise capital from institutions such as insurers and university endowments and lend directly to companies that could not, or would not, obtain traditional bank financing. By some measures the industry is now worth about $3 trillion.
The redemption pressure raises questions for allocators with exposure to the asset class, particularly in software and technology lending. The source article was available only in preview form at the time of writing, so additional detail on fund terms, portfolio composition, and management responses is not included.
The figures were barely lower than the prior quarter, when redemption requests reached 41 percent and 22 percent for the two funds. The results came despite a global effort by Blue Owl executives over the past few months to persuade backers to remain with the firm. In late May, Blue Owl co-chief executive Marc Lipschultz said the industry's "freak out" moment had passed, a statement the latest withdrawal data does not support.
The Times notes that private credit was once among the most admired segments of the financial world. Often described as a rebranding of the high-yield "junk bonds" of the 1980s and 1990s, the asset class grew rapidly after the 2008 financial crisis, partly because regulations discouraged banks from making high-interest loans. A new group of firms emerged to raise capital from institutions such as insurers and university endowments and lend directly to companies that could not, or would not, obtain traditional bank financing. By some measures the industry is now worth about $3 trillion.
The redemption pressure raises questions for allocators with exposure to the asset class, particularly in software and technology lending. The source article was available only in preview form at the time of writing, so additional detail on fund terms, portfolio composition, and management responses is not included.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.