Key Takeaways
- • Akin Gump secured complete summary judgment for Jeffrey Ubben, former Nikola Corporation director, dismissing all securities fraud claims against him in the *Borteanu v. Nikola Corp.* case in U.S. District Court for Arizona on September 9, 2026.
- • The court rejected plaintiffs' argument that Board meeting minutes demonstrated Ubben possessed non-public knowledge of alleged misrepresentations regarding Nikola vehicle reservation backlogs, production plans for the Nikola One, and Badger status.
- • Ubben is the only individual defendant to achieve summary judgment exit; remaining individual defendants had their summary judgment motions denied, allowing claims against them to proceed toward trial.
- • The ruling removes a key defendant from a closely watched securities class action while litigation continues against other named parties, potentially reducing liability exposure for Ubben while preserving claims against co-defendants.
Summary
Akin Gump announced a significant legal victory on behalf of Jeffrey Ubben, a former Nikola Corporation board director, in the ongoing securities fraud class action *Borteanu v. Nikola Corp.* filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. On September 9, 2026, the court granted Ubben's motion for summary judgment in its entirety, completely dismissing all claims against him and removing him from the litigation entirely.
The central dispute hinged on whether Board meeting minutes provided evidence that Ubben possessed scienter—the requisite knowledge of wrongdoing—regarding alleged misrepresentations about Nikola's business operations. Plaintiffs argued that minutes from certain Board meetings demonstrated Ubben had access to non-public information about vehicle reservation backlogs, production plans for the Nikola One vehicle, and the status of the Nikola Badger project. The court rejected this argument, adopting Akin's position that the Board minutes contained no evidence establishing that Ubben possessed any non-public information about these subject matters. The court's ruling was sufficiently dispositive that Akin's additional merits arguments on Ubben's behalf remained unnecessary.
Ubben's complete exit distinguishes him from co-defendants in the action. While the court ruled favorably for Ubben, it denied summary judgment motions filed by the remaining individual defendants, allowing claims against them to advance toward trial. This bifurcated outcome reflects the court's differentiation in the evidentiary records presented by different defendants and underscores Ubben's successful isolation from the broader litigation stream.
The Akin team representing Ubben included litigation partner Scott Barnard, counsel Josh Rubin and Jessica Mannon, and funds litigation partners Doug Rappaport and Kate Shapiro. The victory demonstrates successful defense strategy in a high-profile securities class action and may signal litigation dynamics likely to influence settlement discussions or trial strategy for remaining defendants.
The central dispute hinged on whether Board meeting minutes provided evidence that Ubben possessed scienter—the requisite knowledge of wrongdoing—regarding alleged misrepresentations about Nikola's business operations. Plaintiffs argued that minutes from certain Board meetings demonstrated Ubben had access to non-public information about vehicle reservation backlogs, production plans for the Nikola One vehicle, and the status of the Nikola Badger project. The court rejected this argument, adopting Akin's position that the Board minutes contained no evidence establishing that Ubben possessed any non-public information about these subject matters. The court's ruling was sufficiently dispositive that Akin's additional merits arguments on Ubben's behalf remained unnecessary.
Ubben's complete exit distinguishes him from co-defendants in the action. While the court ruled favorably for Ubben, it denied summary judgment motions filed by the remaining individual defendants, allowing claims against them to advance toward trial. This bifurcated outcome reflects the court's differentiation in the evidentiary records presented by different defendants and underscores Ubben's successful isolation from the broader litigation stream.
The Akin team representing Ubben included litigation partner Scott Barnard, counsel Josh Rubin and Jessica Mannon, and funds litigation partners Doug Rappaport and Kate Shapiro. The victory demonstrates successful defense strategy in a high-profile securities class action and may signal litigation dynamics likely to influence settlement discussions or trial strategy for remaining defendants.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.