Key Takeaways
- • The Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund ($13.8 billion in assets) voted 9-1 on April 9, 2026, to rescind its hiring of Cerity Partners as investment consultant, reversing a March selection of Cerity's newly acquired subsidiary Verus Investments.
- • Cerity Partners, a mega-RIA managing over $150 billion in client assets, acquired Seattle-based Verus Investments in February 2026; Cerity is backed by private equity firms Genstar Capital, Warburg Pincus, and Lightyear Capital.
- • Trustees cited concerns that Cerity's private equity ownership structure creates reputational risks and potential conflicts of interest incompatible with serving as an independent institutional investment consultant.
- • The pension fund has restarted its investment consultant search through a new request for proposals (RFP) and extended its contract with current consultant Callan for one additional year pending completion of the new process.
- • The decision reflects growing institutional scrutiny of ownership changes in the investment consulting industry, where independence from financial sponsors is viewed as foundational to fiduciary credibility.
Summary
The Chicago Public School Teachers' Pension & Retirement Fund terminated its April 2026 engagement of Cerity Partners as investment consultant following trustee objections to the firm's private equity backing. The fund's investment committee voted 9-1 on April 9 to reject the appointment, just weeks after initially selecting Verus Investments in March. The reversal stems from Cerity Partners' acquisition of Verus in February 2026—a transaction that introduced private equity ownership to what trustees had evaluated as an independent consultant.
Cerity Partners, a Chicago-based mega-RIA managing over $150 billion in assets, counts Genstar Capital, Warburg Pincus, and Lightyear Capital among its financial sponsors. According to Fernando Vinzons, Chief Investment Officer at CTPF, trustees determined that Cerity's ownership structure posed unacceptable governance risks. "The Investment Committee voted to revisit the investment consultant search by issuing a new request for proposals," Vinzons stated, noting that the decision follows material changes to the selected firm after the original RFP process concluded.
The decision underscores a fundamental tension in institutional asset management: the perceived independence of advisory firms. Committee members emphasized that private equity involvement creates both reputational concerns and structural conflicts of interest—precisely the type of ownership complications that institutional investors themselves scrutinize when evaluating portfolio company recommendations. This dynamic appears to have moved from a theoretical governance concern to a practical disqualification criterion.
The pension fund has extended its existing contract with Callan, its current investment consultant, for one additional year while establishing a timeline for the new RFP process. The episode reflects broader industry shifts toward consolidation and private capital involvement in the institutional consulting space. As noted by industry observers, firms like Mercer and Hammond Associates have transitioned from independent status to financial sponsor ownership in recent years, narrowing the pool of genuinely independent consultants advising on trillions in institutional capital. For allocators, this contraction makes independence itself an increasingly scarce and valued attribute in consultant selection.
Cerity Partners, a Chicago-based mega-RIA managing over $150 billion in assets, counts Genstar Capital, Warburg Pincus, and Lightyear Capital among its financial sponsors. According to Fernando Vinzons, Chief Investment Officer at CTPF, trustees determined that Cerity's ownership structure posed unacceptable governance risks. "The Investment Committee voted to revisit the investment consultant search by issuing a new request for proposals," Vinzons stated, noting that the decision follows material changes to the selected firm after the original RFP process concluded.
The decision underscores a fundamental tension in institutional asset management: the perceived independence of advisory firms. Committee members emphasized that private equity involvement creates both reputational concerns and structural conflicts of interest—precisely the type of ownership complications that institutional investors themselves scrutinize when evaluating portfolio company recommendations. This dynamic appears to have moved from a theoretical governance concern to a practical disqualification criterion.
The pension fund has extended its existing contract with Callan, its current investment consultant, for one additional year while establishing a timeline for the new RFP process. The episode reflects broader industry shifts toward consolidation and private capital involvement in the institutional consulting space. As noted by industry observers, firms like Mercer and Hammond Associates have transitioned from independent status to financial sponsor ownership in recent years, narrowing the pool of genuinely independent consultants advising on trillions in institutional capital. For allocators, this contraction makes independence itself an increasingly scarce and valued attribute in consultant selection.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.