Key Takeaways
- • CV-squared transactions are reshaping private equity exit strategies: General partners are rolling assets from maturing continuation vehicles into second-generation continuation vehicles (CV-squared), creating a cascading structure that extends holding periods and defers traditional exits in an uncertain market environment.
- • Secondary market volumes demonstrate explosive growth trajectory: Global secondary transaction volume reached $152 billion in 2024, a 39% increase from 2023, with Lazard forecasting $172 billion in 2025; GP-led secondaries now represent approximately 50% of overall secondary market activity with a 26% compound annual growth rate.
- • H1 2025 data reveals significant concentration in GP-led deals: The Jefferies Semi-Annual Secondary Market Review documented $103 billion in secondary volume during the first half of 2025, of which $47 billion comprised GP-led transactions, underscoring the strategic importance of continuation vehicles to sponsor exit planning.
- • Investor scrutiny intensifies over returns, fees, and exit optionality: Limited partners are mounting increased scrutiny on CV-squared structures, questioning the sustainability of extended hold periods, fee multiplicity, and whether rolling assets into successive continuation vehicles genuinely addresses valuation challenges or merely defers resolution.
- • CV-squared maturity creates compounding exit constraints: As second-generation continuation vehicles mature, portfolio companies may reach $10 billion-plus valuations, significantly narrowing the universe of viable exit opportunities and forcing GPs to confront liquidity challenges at unprecedented scale.
Summary
Private equity sponsors are deploying continuation vehicles in successive generations—a structural innovation known as CV-squared transactions—to extend asset holding periods and defer exits in a prolonged market slowdown. Rather than executing traditional liquidity events, general partners are systematically rolling mature assets from first-generation continuation vehicles into newly constituted second-generation vehicles, effectively creating a multi-layered holding structure that extends GP control and capital deployment.
The secondary market infrastructure supporting this trend has expanded substantially. Global secondary transaction volume surged to $152 billion in 2024, representing a 39% year-over-year increase from 2023, according to market data cited in the fnlondon.com report. GP-led secondaries have become the dominant transaction type, now accounting for nearly 50% of total secondary market volume with a robust 26% compound annual growth rate. The Jefferies Semi-Annual Secondary Market Review reinforces this concentration, documenting $103 billion in secondary market activity during H1 2025, with $47 billion attributable to GP-led transactions. Lazard projects secondary market volume will reach $172 billion in 2025, reflecting continued structural momentum.
However, this proliferation of CV-squared structures has triggered heightened investor scrutiny. Limited partners are increasingly questioning the economics and exit viability of successive continuation vehicle rollovers, particularly regarding fee structures, return expectations, and long-term liquidity pathways. A critical concern centers on maturation risk: as second-generation continuation vehicles approach their own exit windows five years hence, portfolio companies may reach valuations exceeding $10 billion, fundamentally constraining the pool of qualified acquirers and forcing GPs to confront severe exit constraints at significantly larger scale.
The CV-squared phenomenon reflects a structural response to macro headwinds—the dealmaking slowdown and M&A market uncertainty have rendered traditional exit routes problematic for sponsors holding high-quality but difficult-to-monetize assets. By extending hold periods through successive continuation vehicles, sponsors preserve optionality and defer forced-sale decisions. Yet this strategy trades immediate liquidity pressure for deferred execution risk, with the sustainability of these structures contingent on eventual exit market normalization or alternative monetization mechanisms. The convergence of massive dry powder, extended hold periods, and multiplying continuation vehicle cohorts suggests the secondary market will face significant deployment challenges in subsequent years.
The secondary market infrastructure supporting this trend has expanded substantially. Global secondary transaction volume surged to $152 billion in 2024, representing a 39% year-over-year increase from 2023, according to market data cited in the fnlondon.com report. GP-led secondaries have become the dominant transaction type, now accounting for nearly 50% of total secondary market volume with a robust 26% compound annual growth rate. The Jefferies Semi-Annual Secondary Market Review reinforces this concentration, documenting $103 billion in secondary market activity during H1 2025, with $47 billion attributable to GP-led transactions. Lazard projects secondary market volume will reach $172 billion in 2025, reflecting continued structural momentum.
However, this proliferation of CV-squared structures has triggered heightened investor scrutiny. Limited partners are increasingly questioning the economics and exit viability of successive continuation vehicle rollovers, particularly regarding fee structures, return expectations, and long-term liquidity pathways. A critical concern centers on maturation risk: as second-generation continuation vehicles approach their own exit windows five years hence, portfolio companies may reach valuations exceeding $10 billion, fundamentally constraining the pool of qualified acquirers and forcing GPs to confront severe exit constraints at significantly larger scale.
The CV-squared phenomenon reflects a structural response to macro headwinds—the dealmaking slowdown and M&A market uncertainty have rendered traditional exit routes problematic for sponsors holding high-quality but difficult-to-monetize assets. By extending hold periods through successive continuation vehicles, sponsors preserve optionality and defer forced-sale decisions. Yet this strategy trades immediate liquidity pressure for deferred execution risk, with the sustainability of these structures contingent on eventual exit market normalization or alternative monetization mechanisms. The convergence of massive dry powder, extended hold periods, and multiplying continuation vehicle cohorts suggests the secondary market will face significant deployment challenges in subsequent years.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.