Key Takeaways
- • ESMA has launched a formal consultation on private credit ratings to examine their purpose, usage, and associated risks, particularly as life insurers expand allocations to illiquid private markets.
- • Private ratings—typically restricted to issuers and select investors—are increasingly relied upon by insurers to support internal risk frameworks and regulatory capital calculations, raising questions about rating comparability and potential bias.
- • A 2024 U.S. National Association of Insurance Commissioners report suggested privately assigned ratings may be more favorable than equivalent public ratings in certain cases; the study was subsequently withdrawn pending clarification.
- • U.S. regulators, including the Treasury Department and state insurance authorities, are simultaneously examining rising insurer exposure to private lending, signaling coordinated international scrutiny of the private credit ratings ecosystem.
Summary
The timing reflects structural shifts in institutional asset allocation. As life insurers deploy capital into private credit and other less liquid instruments, reliance on private ratings has expanded substantially. These assessments, which are typically shared exclusively with issuers and select institutional investors, have become embedded in insurers' internal risk management systems and increasingly influence regulatory capital calculations under European solvency regimes.
This regulatory action is part of a broader transatlantic examination of private credit rating practices. In the United States, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners published a 2024 report suggesting that privately assigned ratings may, in some instances, produce more favorable outcomes than equivalent public ratings—a finding that prompted the study's subsequent withdrawal pending additional analysis and clarification. Concurrently, U.S. regulators including the Treasury Department are engaging state insurance authorities on the topic of rising insurer exposure to private lending portfolios, indicating coordinated concern about rating integrity and investor protection across multiple regulatory jurisdictions.
For institutional investors and fund managers with exposure to private credit markets, the consultation signals potential future constraints on how private ratings are generated, distributed, and used in investment and risk management processes. The outcomes could reshape valuation methodologies, disclosure requirements, and comparability standards across European and potentially aligned U.S. regulatory regimes.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.