Key Takeaways
- • The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), implemented as a post-financial crisis regulatory response, is undergoing formal review with the European Commission's deliberations informed by a KPMG-commissioned report surveying 478 market participants across 15 EU member states.
- • The KPMG report concludes that most AIFMD provisions have achieved their stated objectives, establishing uniform regulatory standards across the EU and bolstering investor confidence in alternative investment funds.
- • The AIFMD created two harmonized "passport systems" for fund managers operating within the EU, though the framework has faced persistent criticism from the private equity community, which views it as an overly strict, crisis-driven regulatory response with unclear regulatory objectives.
- • Policy-makers are expected to implement selective amendments to the Directive, though a complete legislative rewrite remains unlikely given the framework's fundamental success in achieving core regulatory goals.
- • The review process, mandated within the Directive itself and formally initiated by the European Commission by July 2017, represents a critical juncture for assessing the regulatory framework's practical impact on the alternative investment industry across Europe.
Summary
The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive has emerged as a defining regulatory framework for Europe's alternative investment industry, yet it continues to draw significant criticism from the private equity community more than a decade after its implementation. Originally designed as a regulatory response to the 2008 financial crisis, the AIFMD imposed comprehensive pan-European rules governing private equity fund managers, hedge fund managers, and managers of other private funds. Critics have frequently characterized the legislation as a knee-jerk reaction to the financial crisis, questioning whether its regulatory objectives were clearly articulated or appropriately calibrated to achieve specific protective outcomes.
A formal assessment of the Directive's effectiveness is now underway, leveraging a KPMG-commissioned report published in January 2019 that examined the framework's real-world operation. The study drew input from 478 market participants representing 15 EU member states, supplemented by additional data from national financial regulators, fund managers, and industry bodies. According to the report's findings, most provisions of the AIFMD have successfully achieved their stated objectives, establishing uniform regulatory standards across the European Union and demonstrating a measurable positive impact on investor confidence in alternative investment funds.
The AIFMD itself embedded review provisions requiring the European Commission to initiate its assessment by July 2017, creating a formal mechanism for policy-makers to evaluate the framework and determine whether modifications should be pursued. While stakeholders anticipate that targeted amendments may follow this review process, expectations for a comprehensive legislative rewrite remain limited. The evidence base from KPMG's extensive market survey, combined with regulatory data, suggests the Directive's foundational structure has delivered substantive regulatory benefits, even as specific provisions may warrant refinement to address practical implementation challenges identified during the review process.
A formal assessment of the Directive's effectiveness is now underway, leveraging a KPMG-commissioned report published in January 2019 that examined the framework's real-world operation. The study drew input from 478 market participants representing 15 EU member states, supplemented by additional data from national financial regulators, fund managers, and industry bodies. According to the report's findings, most provisions of the AIFMD have successfully achieved their stated objectives, establishing uniform regulatory standards across the European Union and demonstrating a measurable positive impact on investor confidence in alternative investment funds.
The AIFMD itself embedded review provisions requiring the European Commission to initiate its assessment by July 2017, creating a formal mechanism for policy-makers to evaluate the framework and determine whether modifications should be pursued. While stakeholders anticipate that targeted amendments may follow this review process, expectations for a comprehensive legislative rewrite remain limited. The evidence base from KPMG's extensive market survey, combined with regulatory data, suggests the Directive's foundational structure has delivered substantive regulatory benefits, even as specific provisions may warrant refinement to address practical implementation challenges identified during the review process.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.