Key Takeaways
- • Deal volume collapsed 67% in H1 2026 versus H1 2025, but aggregate deal value rose nearly 10%, signaling a strategic pivot toward higher-conviction, larger transactions and away from broad-based deployment.
- • Average deal size increased nearly 4x compared to H1 2025, with megadeals concentrated in sectors exhibiting clear strategic tailwinds, while middle-market activity faced valuation gaps that neither buyers nor sellers could bridge.
- • Fundraising dollars increased 9% in H1 2026 despite fewer funds closing, reflecting LP capital concentration among established managers with strong distributions to paid-in capital (DPI), while emerging and underperforming firms faced extended timelines and reduced targets.
- • Exit liquidity remains structurally constrained, with IPO windows narrow and strategic M&A selective; continuation vehicles and GP-led secondaries have become the primary liquidity mechanism, though increasingly subject to LP skepticism around conflicts of interest.
- • Sector performance diverges sharply: healthcare remains resilient for PE deployment with active take-privates and platform roll-ups, while technology faces valuation complexity as AI disrupts legacy software holdings despite creating new value creation opportunities.
Summary
The fundraising environment reflects similar structural dynamics. Aggregate capital raised climbed 9% in H1 2026 compared to H1 2025, yet the number of funds that closed declined, revealing significant LP reallocation toward established managers demonstrating robust realized returns. Firms with strong distributions to paid-in capital (DPI) raised capital more rapidly, while those with extended unreturned capital bases faced skepticism from LP committees, compressed fundraising targets, and prolonged processes. This bifurcation underscores a shift in how limited partners allocate: after years of compounding unreturned capital, LPs are disciplining their exposure and concentrating commitments among proven performers.
The exit market remains a persistent headwind. IPO windows have not materially widened, strategic buyer appetite remains selective, and sponsor-to-sponsor transactions continue to face valuation scrutiny. In response, continuation vehicles and GP-led secondaries have emerged as the dominant liquidity mechanism—functional alternatives that allow sponsors to extend holding periods and reset return expectations without full realization. However, these structures increasingly draw LP pushback regarding conflicts of interest, as managers deploy capital into their own funds while managing legacy holdings.
Portfolio performance diverges sharply by sector. Healthcare has proven most resilient for PE capital deployment, with take-private transactions and platform roll-ups proceeding at sustained pace. Technology, historically PE's highest-returning sector, now confronts a more complex environment as artificial intelligence reshapes the competitive and valuation dynamics of legacy software holdings. While AI creates new value creation levers for forward-thinking sponsors, it simultaneously complicates exit timing and valuation for holdings built on pre-AI business models. This heterogeneous sectoral backdrop underscores the premium sponsors are placing on sector selectivity and operational insight in the current environment.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.