Key Takeaways
- • The private markets industry faces a critical "risk literacy gap," with investment reporting historically focused on returns while systematically underweighting risk communication and assessment to institutional investors.
- • The UK Financial Conduct Authority is preparing to launch a formal review on valuations in private markets, signaling regulatory pressure for improved transparency and risk disclosure standards.
- • Opacity in private company holdings and competitive secrecy create asymmetric information dynamics that force investors to rely on imperfect substitutes for risk measurement, limiting their ability to conduct adequate due diligence.
- • Reform in private markets risk measurement appears inevitable, with the pace and scope dependent on evolving power dynamics between asset managers and their investors, alongside industry innovation to enable disclosure without undermining competitive advantages.
- • Industry leaders, including Kathleen Keenan (Chief Product Officer at Confluence), are calling for greater disclosure standards to bridge the gap between manager-provided performance metrics and investor need for substantive risk insight.
Summary
The private markets industry confronts a structural challenge in risk measurement that has long been obscured by focus on investment returns. As WealthBriefing reports, financial markets—particularly private markets—suffer from what experts characterize as a "risk literacy gap," wherein the investment industry has traditionally prioritized return communication while creating a critical blind spot around risk assessment and disclosure. This pattern persists partly because returns are intuitive for human interpretation, whereas risk is conceptually difficult and operationally complex to quantify and communicate.
The regulatory environment is tightening in response to these deficiencies. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority is preparing to launch a formal review on valuations in private markets, reflecting growing institutional concern about transparency and the adequacy of current risk measurement frameworks. This regulatory momentum underscores that reform is not a discretionary industry initiative but an increasingly inevitable requirement.
The structural challenge stems from the opaque nature of private companies and investment funds. While managers routinely provide key performance indicators and return metrics, they deliberately limit disclosure of underlying holdings to protect competitive advantage—a rational behavior in a competitive industry. This asymmetric information environment forces investors to operate with incomplete risk intelligence, relying on proxy metrics and imperfect substitutes for genuine insight into portfolio risk composition. For institutional investors, family offices, and hedge funds seeking to allocate capital responsibly, this creates a material governance problem.
According to Kathleen Keenan, Chief Product Officer at Confluence, addressing this gap requires balancing investor demands for transparency against legitimate manager concerns about competitive harm. The path forward will depend on how power dynamics evolve between capital providers and asset managers, and whether the industry can innovate solutions that enable meaningful risk disclosure without compromising proprietary information or market competition. As private markets continue to grow in importance for institutional portfolios, the resolution of this risk measurement gap will likely become a primary determinant of investor confidence and capital flows into the sector.
The regulatory environment is tightening in response to these deficiencies. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority is preparing to launch a formal review on valuations in private markets, reflecting growing institutional concern about transparency and the adequacy of current risk measurement frameworks. This regulatory momentum underscores that reform is not a discretionary industry initiative but an increasingly inevitable requirement.
The structural challenge stems from the opaque nature of private companies and investment funds. While managers routinely provide key performance indicators and return metrics, they deliberately limit disclosure of underlying holdings to protect competitive advantage—a rational behavior in a competitive industry. This asymmetric information environment forces investors to operate with incomplete risk intelligence, relying on proxy metrics and imperfect substitutes for genuine insight into portfolio risk composition. For institutional investors, family offices, and hedge funds seeking to allocate capital responsibly, this creates a material governance problem.
According to Kathleen Keenan, Chief Product Officer at Confluence, addressing this gap requires balancing investor demands for transparency against legitimate manager concerns about competitive harm. The path forward will depend on how power dynamics evolve between capital providers and asset managers, and whether the industry can innovate solutions that enable meaningful risk disclosure without compromising proprietary information or market competition. As private markets continue to grow in importance for institutional portfolios, the resolution of this risk measurement gap will likely become a primary determinant of investor confidence and capital flows into the sector.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.