Key Takeaways
- • Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund investment committee voted 9–1 on April 9, 2026, to reject Cerity Partners as its investment consultant, reversing a prior decision to hire Verus (which merged with Cerity earlier that month).
- • Multiple trustees cited concerns about private equity firms' minority stakes in Cerity as the primary reason for rejection, signaling growing institutional skepticism toward PE-backed advisory relationships.
- • The $13.8 billion pension fund is simultaneously managing a governance transition, having voted 6–4 in a separate action to sever its 15-year relationship with investment consultant Callan, which trustees associated with entrenched private equity advocacy.
- • The fund's new board majority is actively questioning private equity efficacy following years of PE underperformance relative to public markets, while addressing Chicago's severe pension underfunding (the city's total pension shortfall stands at $42,600 per taxpayer).
- • CTPF will relaunch its investment consultant RFP process, creating a competitive reset in a high-stakes institutional mandate for one of the nation's largest public pension funds.
Summary
The Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund (CTPF) delivered a significant rebuke to the institutional advisory establishment on April 9, 2026, when its investment committee voted 9–1 to reject Cerity Partners as its new investment consultant. The decision reversed momentum from a March vote to hire Verus, the institutional consultant that completed a merger with Cerity Partners earlier this month. According to a livestream of the meeting, multiple trustees explicitly objected to private equity firms' minority ownership stakes in Cerity, signaling heightened scrutiny of advisor conflicts of interest in PE-dependent business models.
The vote reflects a broader power shift within CTPF's governance structure. In a separate 6–4 decision, the board voted to terminate its 15-year relationship with Callan, the long-standing investment consultant blamed for maintaining tight alignment with private equity managers and Wall Street practices. The Callan decision was contested by CTPF's internal investment staff, including Chief Investment Officer Fernando Vinzons and Internal Auditor Sean Hickey, who advocated for continuity. However, a newly ascendant board majority—led by CTPF President Jacquelyn Price Ward—prioritized scrutiny of private equity performance and governance reform over institutional inertia. Board members raised concerns about PE underperformance relative to public markets over recent years, a finding now resonating across public pension systems nationally.
Verus' presentation to CTPF during the RFP process revealed the tensions driving the rejection. While Verus presented two scenarios for the fund's strategic allocation—one of which would eliminate private equity and private credit entirely in favor of real assets and infrastructure—the subsequent merger announcement with Cerity triggered trustee concerns about advisor independence. When CTPF President Ward specifically asked about the Verus-Cerity merger's implications, Verus responded that staff would remain unchanged, a reassurance that proved insufficient to overcome PE ownership concerns among the voting committee.
The decision carries material consequences for a $13.8 billion fund operating within Chicago's fiscally stressed environment. The city's total pension shortfall amounts to $42,600 per taxpayer, with Chicago's combined pension funds holding only 25 cents for every dollar owed—far below typical funding ratios of approximately 80% for most state and local systems. Against this backdrop, CTPF's board majority is signaling that investment advisory relationships must align with fiduciary skepticism toward private equity's historical returns and embedded conflicts. The fund will now relaunch its investment consultant RFP, creating an open competitive process that may reshape advisor incentive structures within major institutional mandates.
The vote reflects a broader power shift within CTPF's governance structure. In a separate 6–4 decision, the board voted to terminate its 15-year relationship with Callan, the long-standing investment consultant blamed for maintaining tight alignment with private equity managers and Wall Street practices. The Callan decision was contested by CTPF's internal investment staff, including Chief Investment Officer Fernando Vinzons and Internal Auditor Sean Hickey, who advocated for continuity. However, a newly ascendant board majority—led by CTPF President Jacquelyn Price Ward—prioritized scrutiny of private equity performance and governance reform over institutional inertia. Board members raised concerns about PE underperformance relative to public markets over recent years, a finding now resonating across public pension systems nationally.
Verus' presentation to CTPF during the RFP process revealed the tensions driving the rejection. While Verus presented two scenarios for the fund's strategic allocation—one of which would eliminate private equity and private credit entirely in favor of real assets and infrastructure—the subsequent merger announcement with Cerity triggered trustee concerns about advisor independence. When CTPF President Ward specifically asked about the Verus-Cerity merger's implications, Verus responded that staff would remain unchanged, a reassurance that proved insufficient to overcome PE ownership concerns among the voting committee.
The decision carries material consequences for a $13.8 billion fund operating within Chicago's fiscally stressed environment. The city's total pension shortfall amounts to $42,600 per taxpayer, with Chicago's combined pension funds holding only 25 cents for every dollar owed—far below typical funding ratios of approximately 80% for most state and local systems. Against this backdrop, CTPF's board majority is signaling that investment advisory relationships must align with fiduciary skepticism toward private equity's historical returns and embedded conflicts. The fund will now relaunch its investment consultant RFP, creating an open competitive process that may reshape advisor incentive structures within major institutional mandates.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.