Key Takeaways
- • KKR & Co. has barred non-compete agreements for employees earning under $100,000 a year at its US portfolio companies, covering both existing and new contracts.
- • KKR is no longer enforcing existing non-competes for these lower-paid workers, according to Pete Stavros, the firm's co-head of global private equity.
- • The firm aims to extend the policy to employees earning more than $100,000 over time, per Stavros.
- • The move is intended to demonstrate that restrictive covenants are not necessary for portfolio companies to remain competitive.
Summary
Workers earning less than $100,000 a year at companies owned by KKR are no longer subject to non-competes, Pete Stavros, the firm's co-head of global private equity, said in an interview with Bloomberg. Under the policy, KKR has banned enforcement of existing non-competes as well as the use of new ones for this employee group. Stavros said the firm intends to expand the policy over time to employees earning more than $100,000.
The decision comes amid a broader debate over non-compete restrictions in the United States. Federal efforts to restrict such clauses have been unsettled: the Federal Trade Commission's 2024 rule banning most non-competes was stopped by a district court order on August 20, 2024, and is not in effect. Several states have moved independently, including Washington, where essentially all existing non-compete agreements will become void for Washington-based workers starting June 30, 2027. KKR's policy applies at the portfolio company level and is a voluntary private-sector measure rather than a response to a regulatory mandate.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.