Key Takeaways
- • Only one-third of U.S. and Canadian university and college endowments have achieved sufficient returns over the past 10 years to cover operational costs, with just 42 of 119 endowments exceeding $1 billion reaching the required 8 percent annual return threshold.
- • The average 10-year return across large endowments stands at 7.7 percent, falling short of the 8 percent benchmark needed to sustain institutional costs including operations, administration, student aid, and capital preservation, according to executive recruiter Charles Skorina's analysis.
- • Major institutions including Harvard (7.8 percent), Columbia (7.4 percent), Northwestern (7.3 percent), and UC Berkeley (6.7 percent) fall below the critical 8 percent benchmark, with only Babson College among mid-sized endowments ($500 million to $1 billion) exceeding the threshold.
- • A proposed congressional bill would raise the excise tax on certain private university endowment profits from 1.4 percent to 21 percent, a potential policy shift that could fundamentally reshape endowment management strategies and reduce portfolio activity.
- • Higher taxation of endowment returns is expected to force institutional investors toward buy-and-hold strategies and away from active trading, as schools seek to achieve the elusive 8 percent return needed to cover costs in a higher-tax environment.
Summary
University and college endowments across North America face a significant performance gap, with the vast majority unable to generate sufficient investment returns to cover their operational needs over the past decade. According to Charles Skorina, an executive recruiter who tracks endowment performance, only one-third of U.S. and Canadian endowments have achieved the 8 percent annual return required to sustain institutional costs—which encompass operations, administration, student aid distribution, and capital conservation. Among the largest funds, the shortfall is particularly acute: just 42 of 119 endowments with assets exceeding $1 billion have met this threshold, with the broader cohort averaging 7.7 percent annually.
The performance challenge extends across prestigious institutions. Harvard University returned 7.8 percent over the 10-year period, while Columbia (7.4 percent), Northwestern (7.3 percent), and UC Berkeley (6.7 percent) similarly underperformed. Other major endowments including Howard University (7.7 percent), Cornell (7.7 percent), Tufts (7.1 percent), and UCLA (6.8 percent) have all fallen short of the 8 percent target. Among the mid-sized endowment category ($500 million to $1 billion in assets), only Babson College surpassed the benchmark, highlighting the breadth of the underperformance challenge across institutional types.
The performance shortfall arrives amid emerging regulatory headwinds that threaten to intensify endowment pressures. Two Republican members of Congress have introduced legislation that would increase the excise tax on certain private university endowment profits from 1.4 percent to 21 percent—a substantially higher burden that Skorina interprets as likely applying to all major endowments. This potential tax increase would force meaningful strategic adjustments in portfolio management. Skorina predicts the tax hike will eliminate "frictionless trading" and drive endowments toward buy-and-hold investment approaches resembling Warren Buffett's strategy, as institutions attempt to preserve capital and reduce tax friction while pursuing their 8 percent return objectives.
The combination of historically modest returns and potential tax policy changes creates a compounding challenge for university financial management. Endowments must balance capital preservation, inflation protection, and current spending obligations while operating in an environment where even premium asset management has consistently fallen short of the required return threshold. The proposed legislative shift underscores growing political scrutiny of endowment tax treatment and suggests that future endowment returns will operate within a fundamentally different regulatory and strategic framework.
The performance challenge extends across prestigious institutions. Harvard University returned 7.8 percent over the 10-year period, while Columbia (7.4 percent), Northwestern (7.3 percent), and UC Berkeley (6.7 percent) similarly underperformed. Other major endowments including Howard University (7.7 percent), Cornell (7.7 percent), Tufts (7.1 percent), and UCLA (6.8 percent) have all fallen short of the 8 percent target. Among the mid-sized endowment category ($500 million to $1 billion in assets), only Babson College surpassed the benchmark, highlighting the breadth of the underperformance challenge across institutional types.
The performance shortfall arrives amid emerging regulatory headwinds that threaten to intensify endowment pressures. Two Republican members of Congress have introduced legislation that would increase the excise tax on certain private university endowment profits from 1.4 percent to 21 percent—a substantially higher burden that Skorina interprets as likely applying to all major endowments. This potential tax increase would force meaningful strategic adjustments in portfolio management. Skorina predicts the tax hike will eliminate "frictionless trading" and drive endowments toward buy-and-hold investment approaches resembling Warren Buffett's strategy, as institutions attempt to preserve capital and reduce tax friction while pursuing their 8 percent return objectives.
The combination of historically modest returns and potential tax policy changes creates a compounding challenge for university financial management. Endowments must balance capital preservation, inflation protection, and current spending obligations while operating in an environment where even premium asset management has consistently fallen short of the required return threshold. The proposed legislative shift underscores growing political scrutiny of endowment tax treatment and suggests that future endowment returns will operate within a fundamentally different regulatory and strategic framework.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.