Key Takeaways
- • DC pension home bias has collapsed: Workplace Defined Contribution (DC) assets invested in the UK have fallen from approximately 50% a decade ago to around 20% currently, driven primarily by a shift away from UK listed equities.
- • Private-sector DB funds remain domestically concentrated: Over 60% of private-sector Defined Benefit (DB) assets remain invested in the UK, with gilts now replacing equities as the primary domestic holding (UK equities comprise just 1% of private DB assets).
- • Public-sector pension allocations moderate: Around 30% of public-sector DB assets—predominantly Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) holdings—are invested domestically, primarily through UK listed equities, government bonds, and property.
- • UK equity allocation among peers is comparatively low: UK pension funds hold approximately 8% of equities domestically in DC schemes, 11% in private DB, and 17% in LGPS—substantially lower than peer nations including Canada (22%), New Zealand (42%), and Australia (45%).
- • Domestic investment carries structural economic implications: Pension fund capital deployed in UK markets has demonstrable potential to support economic growth and capital market development, though systemic barriers currently constrain deployment at scale.
Summary
Private-sector Defined Benefit funds present a contrasting profile, maintaining over 60% domestic allocation despite a fundamental recomposition of holdings. Notably, UK listed equity positions have contracted to just 1% of private DB assets, with this decline almost entirely offset by increased gilt holdings. Public-sector DB schemes, predominantly represented by Local Government Pension Scheme holdings in England and Wales, sit at a 30% domestic allocation threshold, with exposure distributed across UK listed equities, government bonds, and real property investments.
When examined against international comparators, UK pension funds demonstrate lower home bias in listed equities than several peer economies. Current domestic equity allocations stand at 8% for DC schemes, 11% for private DB, and 17% for LGPS—all substantially below Canadian (22%), New Zealand (42%), and Australian (45%) equity holdings. However, analysis indicates that DC and LGPS private market portfolios carry disproportionately elevated weighting toward domestic investments relative to some comparator jurisdictions, suggesting heterogeneous bias patterns across asset classes rather than uniform internationalization.
The government's research identifies material economic implications tied to domestic pension capital deployment. Increased pension fund investment in UK markets carries potential to catalyze stronger economic growth and support capital market development, though the analysis acknowledges that policy objectives face systemic constraints limiting large-scale domestic capital deployment. The data underscores a persistent tension between institutional asset allocation strategies that favor international diversification and policy objectives aimed at channeling retirement capital toward domestic economic activity.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.