Key Takeaways
- • Continuation funds have grown to more than $55 billion in the first half of 2026, according to investment bank Evercore, as private-equity firms move high-performing businesses from older funds into new vehicles.
- • Limited partners in the original funds are largely cashed out in these transactions, with new investors brought in, a structure that has prompted growing investor complaints.
- • Investors are reportedly frustrated by take-it-or-leave-it terms, with concerns that these deals can favor fund managers over the investors they represent.
- • The growing backlash comes as the buyout industry continues to contend with a prolonged slump in deal activity.
Summary
Private-equity investors are increasingly concerned that they are being shortchanged by continuation vehicles, a deal structure that allows fund managers to keep their best-performing assets for longer. According to investment bank Evercore, continuation funds have grown to more than $55 billion during the first half of 2026. The structure involves a private-equity manager transferring a high-performing business from an older fund into a newer one.
In these transactions, the original fund's limited partners are typically cashed out, and new investors are brought in to the continuation vehicle. Critics argue that this arrangement can disadvantage existing investors, who may face a take-it-or-leave-it choice between selling their stakes at the offered terms or remaining invested in the asset under the new structure.
The growing pushback reflects broader strains in the buyout industry, which has been contending with a long slump. As continuation deals become a more common tool for managers seeking liquidity and extended holding periods, scrutiny of their fairness to limited partners is intensifying. The source article notes that the backlash is focused on the potential for these deals to benefit fund managers over their investors.
In these transactions, the original fund's limited partners are typically cashed out, and new investors are brought in to the continuation vehicle. Critics argue that this arrangement can disadvantage existing investors, who may face a take-it-or-leave-it choice between selling their stakes at the offered terms or remaining invested in the asset under the new structure.
The growing pushback reflects broader strains in the buyout industry, which has been contending with a long slump. As continuation deals become a more common tool for managers seeking liquidity and extended holding periods, scrutiny of their fairness to limited partners is intensifying. The source article notes that the backlash is focused on the potential for these deals to benefit fund managers over their investors.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.