Key Takeaways
- • Danish pension fund Sampension maintains private equity allocation despite underperformance, signaling institutional conviction in the asset class despite weak recent returns relative to public equities.
- • Private equity significantly underperforms public markets: PE evergreen funds generated a median 11.97% return in 2025 versus the S&P 500's 17.43% and MSCI ACWI's 22.34%, while charging substantially higher fees (3-5%+ expense ratios).
- • Broader institutional retreat from PE accelerating: Nearly one-third of public pension funds reduced PE exposure in the past year, with Oregon's PERS cutting allocation from 27% to 25%, reflecting systemic performance concerns and exit velocity challenges.
- • Secondary market discounting intensifies: Pension funds are increasingly willing to exit PE positions at 15%+ discounts on the secondary market, indicating forced asset reallocation driven by extended holding periods and stalled liquidity events.
- • Three-year returns validate performance concerns: PE evergreen funds generated median 11.31% annualized returns over 2023-2025, approximately half the S&P 500's 22.48% return over the same period, raising questions about fee justification and asset allocation logic.
Summary
Sampension, Denmark's largest pension fund with 348 billion kroner in assets, is maintaining its private equity exposure despite a sector-wide performance crisis that has prompted widespread institutional capital flight. The decision reflects a contrarian stance as nearly one-third of U.S. public pension funds reduced PE allocations in the past year, and major institutional investors increasingly question whether private equity's elevated fee structures justify demonstrably inferior returns.
The performance gap between private equity and public markets has become stark and persistent. Private equity evergreen funds—vehicles targeting retail and institutional investors—generated a median net return of just 11.97% in 2025, substantially trailing both the S&P 500 Index's 17.43% return and the broader MSCI ACWI Index's 22.34% return. This underperformance persists despite these PE funds charging expense ratios ranging from 3% to 5.2%, with maximum sales charges reaching 12.54%. When examined on a three-year basis (2023-2025), the structural underperformance deepens: PE evergreen funds delivered median annualized returns of 11.31%, representing less than half the S&P 500's 22.48% return over the identical period.
The industry's challenges extend beyond simple return metrics. Exit velocity has slowed materially since mid-2022, leaving investors holding illiquid positions in portfolio companies for extended periods without realizing gains. This bottleneck has spawned a parallel secondary market where pension funds increasingly accept significant haircuts—starting at 15% discounts—to exit PE positions, according to Reuters reporting. This forced selling indicates that capital allocation decisions, once made with confidence, are now being reversed by sophisticated institutional investors facing opportunity costs and liquidity constraints.
Sampension's decision to maintain PE exposure occurs against this backdrop of institutional skepticism. The fund's reported 2025 performance (18.4 billion kroner in investment gains) suggests overall portfolio resilience despite market volatility, but the specific allocation choice regarding private equity stands out as contrarian relative to broader pension fund behavior. The decision may reflect either conviction in specific GP relationships, longer time horizons, or portfolio diversification rationales that extend beyond raw return comparisons, though these rationales remain unstated in available disclosures.
The performance gap between private equity and public markets has become stark and persistent. Private equity evergreen funds—vehicles targeting retail and institutional investors—generated a median net return of just 11.97% in 2025, substantially trailing both the S&P 500 Index's 17.43% return and the broader MSCI ACWI Index's 22.34% return. This underperformance persists despite these PE funds charging expense ratios ranging from 3% to 5.2%, with maximum sales charges reaching 12.54%. When examined on a three-year basis (2023-2025), the structural underperformance deepens: PE evergreen funds delivered median annualized returns of 11.31%, representing less than half the S&P 500's 22.48% return over the identical period.
The industry's challenges extend beyond simple return metrics. Exit velocity has slowed materially since mid-2022, leaving investors holding illiquid positions in portfolio companies for extended periods without realizing gains. This bottleneck has spawned a parallel secondary market where pension funds increasingly accept significant haircuts—starting at 15% discounts—to exit PE positions, according to Reuters reporting. This forced selling indicates that capital allocation decisions, once made with confidence, are now being reversed by sophisticated institutional investors facing opportunity costs and liquidity constraints.
Sampension's decision to maintain PE exposure occurs against this backdrop of institutional skepticism. The fund's reported 2025 performance (18.4 billion kroner in investment gains) suggests overall portfolio resilience despite market volatility, but the specific allocation choice regarding private equity stands out as contrarian relative to broader pension fund behavior. The decision may reflect either conviction in specific GP relationships, longer time horizons, or portfolio diversification rationales that extend beyond raw return comparisons, though these rationales remain unstated in available disclosures.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.