Key Takeaways
- • Somerset Pension Fund is actively evaluating private equity allocations as part of its investment strategy, requiring formal risk assessment processes through its risk register framework.
- • Public pension funds collectively hold approximately $1 trillion in private equity exposure with additional committed capital, according to academic research cited across institutional pension literature.
- • Reported private equity risk metrics significantly understate actual volatility—research from financial mathematician Michael Markov indicates pension funds underreport risks by at least 20 percent on average, with Oregon's state pension fund exhibiting over 40 percent greater volatility than officially reported.
- • Private equity's illiquid, opaque structure and debt-fueled acquisition strategies create embedded risks that pension fund reporting mechanisms inadequately capture, particularly regarding stale pricing in fund valuations.
- • Pension funds represent 43 percent of total private equity capital invested globally (per Preqin data), positioning them as the largest investor class in the sector despite growing scrutiny of risk disclosure practices.
Summary
Somerset Pension Fund is undertaking a formal reassessment of its private equity investment exposure, utilizing its risk register to evaluate both investment and non-investment risks associated with potential private market allocations. This review reflects a broader institutional trend among local government pension schemes, particularly following significant governance changes within pension committees at major local authorities.
The Somerset fund's consideration occurs within a context of substantial aggregate exposure across the UK and US public pension landscape. Academic research indicates that public pension plans collectively carry close to $1 trillion in private equity exposure, with additional capital already committed to future drawdowns. Globally, pension funds—both public and private—constitute 43 percent of all capital deployed into private equity, making them the dominant investor class in the sector, according to Preqin data.
However, research from Michael Markov, a financial mathematician whose firm provided early warnings on the Madoff fraud, reveals critical gaps in pension fund risk reporting. His analysis demonstrates that pension funds systematically understate the volatility and risk embedded in their private equity holdings by at least 20 percent on average. The Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, widely recognized for transparent reporting, exemplifies this problem: its actual volatility exceeds official reported statistics by over 40 percent. The principal cause is stale pricing—private equity fund valuations rely on infrequent appraisals of private companies, which mechanically suppress reported volatility and mask true downside risk exposure.
Private equity structures compound these measurement challenges through their fundamental characteristics: illiquidity, opacity, and debt-fueled acquisition strategies. Funds engage in leveraged takeovers that create hidden risks inadequately captured in standard pension fund reporting frameworks. The tension between pension funds' pursuit of high returns—exceeding those available from traditional stocks and bonds—and the true risk profile of private equity investments remains poorly understood by many beneficiaries and oversight committees. Somerset Pension Fund's formal risk assessment process represents a prudent institutional response to these structural information asymmetries.
The Somerset fund's consideration occurs within a context of substantial aggregate exposure across the UK and US public pension landscape. Academic research indicates that public pension plans collectively carry close to $1 trillion in private equity exposure, with additional capital already committed to future drawdowns. Globally, pension funds—both public and private—constitute 43 percent of all capital deployed into private equity, making them the dominant investor class in the sector, according to Preqin data.
However, research from Michael Markov, a financial mathematician whose firm provided early warnings on the Madoff fraud, reveals critical gaps in pension fund risk reporting. His analysis demonstrates that pension funds systematically understate the volatility and risk embedded in their private equity holdings by at least 20 percent on average. The Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, widely recognized for transparent reporting, exemplifies this problem: its actual volatility exceeds official reported statistics by over 40 percent. The principal cause is stale pricing—private equity fund valuations rely on infrequent appraisals of private companies, which mechanically suppress reported volatility and mask true downside risk exposure.
Private equity structures compound these measurement challenges through their fundamental characteristics: illiquidity, opacity, and debt-fueled acquisition strategies. Funds engage in leveraged takeovers that create hidden risks inadequately captured in standard pension fund reporting frameworks. The tension between pension funds' pursuit of high returns—exceeding those available from traditional stocks and bonds—and the true risk profile of private equity investments remains poorly understood by many beneficiaries and oversight committees. Somerset Pension Fund's formal risk assessment process represents a prudent institutional response to these structural information asymmetries.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.