Key Takeaways
- • M.I.T. and Stanford led Ivy League endowment returns for fiscal year 2025 with 14.8% and 14.3% respectively, significantly outpacing their prior-year performance of 8.9% and 8.4%, driven by strong public equity market performance and active management gains.
- • All nine reporting Ivy endowments posted double-digit returns, with Columbia (12.4%), Penn (12.2%), Brown (11.9%), Harvard (11.9%), Yale (11.1%), Princeton (11%), and Dartmouth (10.8%) completing the rankings as of October 27, 2025.
- • Private equity holdings remain a critical drag on overall endowment performance despite improved returns versus prior years—Columbia's CIO Kim Lew explicitly noted that private investment gains still lag public market performance, underscoring the structural challenge facing large endowment portfolios.
- • New federal endowment tax regimes now impose 8% tax rates on Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford, while Penn and Dartmouth face 4% rates, with remaining Ivy institutions at 1.4%—compounding operational headwinds alongside slower capital return cycles from illiquid asset positions.
- • Brad Conger, chief investment officer at Hirtle Callaghan, characterized the endowment landscape as a "perfect storm of pinched operations and slower returns of capital," signaling that diversification strategies into alternative assets have failed to offset private equity underperformance.
Summary
Nearly all Ivy League endowments delivered stronger fiscal-year returns in 2025 compared to 2024, buoyed primarily by resilient public equity markets and successful active management execution. However, substantial performance gaps persist between public and private asset classes, with private equity emerging as the singular most significant constraint on overall portfolio returns across the sector.
M.I.T. and Stanford dominated the rankings with net returns of 14.8% and 14.3% respectively, representing material year-over-year improvements from 8.9% and 8.4% in fiscal 2024. Columbia University returned 12.4%, up from 11.5% the prior year, while Penn, Brown, Harvard, and Yale each posted returns between 11.1% and 12.2%. Princeton achieved 11% and Dartmouth 10.8%, with Cornell University's results still outstanding as of October 27. This broad-based outperformance masks a critical structural weakness: private investments continue to underperform public markets despite incremental gains versus recent prior years.
Kim Lew, president and CEO of Columbia Investment Management Co., highlighted this dynamic explicitly, noting that while the endowment's "private investments saw a significant improvement versus the last few years … performance still lags public market performance." This statement encapsulates the core challenge facing large institutional allocators: despite meaningful recovery in illiquid asset returns, the public-private performance gap remains substantial enough to materially depress overall endowment outcomes.
Beyond operational performance, Ivy endowments face mounting fiscal headwinds. New federal endowment tax provisions enacted this year impose 8% tax rates on Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford, while Penn and Dartmouth now face 4% levies, with remaining institutions holding at 1.4%. Brad Conger, chief investment officer at Hirtle Callaghan, characterized the combined environment as a "perfect storm of pinched operations and slower returns of capital than we thought," emphasizing that traditional diversification strategies into alternative assets have failed to provide the protective hedge historically expected. The private equity allocation problem, Conger indicated, remains the most pressing issue for large endowment portfolios moving forward.
M.I.T. and Stanford dominated the rankings with net returns of 14.8% and 14.3% respectively, representing material year-over-year improvements from 8.9% and 8.4% in fiscal 2024. Columbia University returned 12.4%, up from 11.5% the prior year, while Penn, Brown, Harvard, and Yale each posted returns between 11.1% and 12.2%. Princeton achieved 11% and Dartmouth 10.8%, with Cornell University's results still outstanding as of October 27. This broad-based outperformance masks a critical structural weakness: private investments continue to underperform public markets despite incremental gains versus recent prior years.
Kim Lew, president and CEO of Columbia Investment Management Co., highlighted this dynamic explicitly, noting that while the endowment's "private investments saw a significant improvement versus the last few years … performance still lags public market performance." This statement encapsulates the core challenge facing large institutional allocators: despite meaningful recovery in illiquid asset returns, the public-private performance gap remains substantial enough to materially depress overall endowment outcomes.
Beyond operational performance, Ivy endowments face mounting fiscal headwinds. New federal endowment tax provisions enacted this year impose 8% tax rates on Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford, while Penn and Dartmouth now face 4% levies, with remaining institutions holding at 1.4%. Brad Conger, chief investment officer at Hirtle Callaghan, characterized the combined environment as a "perfect storm of pinched operations and slower returns of capital than we thought," emphasizing that traditional diversification strategies into alternative assets have failed to provide the protective hedge historically expected. The private equity allocation problem, Conger indicated, remains the most pressing issue for large endowment portfolios moving forward.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.