Key Takeaways
- • A widow has been waiting approximately two years for a £186,366 settlement payment following her husband Ian Ducker's death in February 2022, after he invested £300,000 in the Carlton James Commercial Real Estate Fund.
- • Monthly pension payments from the real estate fund ceased abruptly in 2020 without explanation, forcing Mr. Ducker to take out multiple loans to sustain retirement income that was expected to reach £4,000 monthly.
- • In April 2023, the fund offered Mrs. Ducker a buyback settlement of $244,388 (£186,366) as an "alternative exit strategy," which she accepted but has yet to receive as of December 2025—a 20-month delay.
- • The case highlights liquidity and payout risks inherent in self-administered pension schemes invested in illiquid real estate funds, particularly during market disruptions such as the 2020 pandemic.
- • Mrs. Ducker, now living in Buckinghamshire after relocating from Spain, has resumed employment due to the extended payment delay and continued lack of access to her late husband's pension capital.
Summary
The widow of Ian Ducker, who died in February 2022 at age 69 following two heart attacks, has escalated her pursuit of funds from a stalled real estate investment that disrupted her family's retirement plan. Mr. Ducker had established a self-administered pension scheme through his construction company in 2014 and invested approximately £300,000 into the Carlton James Commercial Real Estate Fund, initially receiving regular monthly payments until the pandemic struck in 2020.
The suspension of payments—which occurred without timely explanation—forced Mr. Ducker into financial distress. He had relocated his family to Spain with explicit plans to retire on approximately £4,000 monthly from the fund distribution. When payments ceased, he resorted to taking out multiple loans to bridge living expenses. According to his widow Aleksandra Ducker, the financial and emotional strain exacerbated his underlying health conditions during his final years. She described the situation as "really cruel," noting that the stress significantly impacted his quality of life immediately before his death.
Following Mr. Ducker's death, Mrs. Ducker became trustee of the pension scheme and received a buyback proposal in April 2023. The Carlton James Commercial Real Estate Fund offered an alternative exit strategy providing a lump sum of $244,388 (£186,366)—substantially less than the accumulated value Mrs. Ducker anticipated. Despite this shortfall, she accepted the settlement to sever ties with the fund. As of the current date, nearly two years after accepting the offer, the payment remains unsettled.
The delays have forced material changes to Mrs. Ducker's circumstances. She relocated from Spain back to the United Kingdom, settling in Buckinghamshire, and has returned to employment due to lack of access to the promised settlement. The case underscores the liquidity risks and administrative vulnerabilities inherent in self-administered pension schemes holding illiquid alternative investments, particularly when fund payment structures collapse during market stress events without clear communication or defined recovery mechanisms for beneficiaries.
The suspension of payments—which occurred without timely explanation—forced Mr. Ducker into financial distress. He had relocated his family to Spain with explicit plans to retire on approximately £4,000 monthly from the fund distribution. When payments ceased, he resorted to taking out multiple loans to bridge living expenses. According to his widow Aleksandra Ducker, the financial and emotional strain exacerbated his underlying health conditions during his final years. She described the situation as "really cruel," noting that the stress significantly impacted his quality of life immediately before his death.
Following Mr. Ducker's death, Mrs. Ducker became trustee of the pension scheme and received a buyback proposal in April 2023. The Carlton James Commercial Real Estate Fund offered an alternative exit strategy providing a lump sum of $244,388 (£186,366)—substantially less than the accumulated value Mrs. Ducker anticipated. Despite this shortfall, she accepted the settlement to sever ties with the fund. As of the current date, nearly two years after accepting the offer, the payment remains unsettled.
The delays have forced material changes to Mrs. Ducker's circumstances. She relocated from Spain back to the United Kingdom, settling in Buckinghamshire, and has returned to employment due to lack of access to the promised settlement. The case underscores the liquidity risks and administrative vulnerabilities inherent in self-administered pension schemes holding illiquid alternative investments, particularly when fund payment structures collapse during market stress events without clear communication or defined recovery mechanisms for beneficiaries.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.