Key Takeaways
- • Six major RIAs have transitioned away from traditional 60/40 portfolios toward diversified alternatives and real assets strategies, including BBR Partners, The Colony Group, Laird Norton Wealth Management, Mercer Advisors, Osaic (formerly Advisor Group), and Savant Wealth Management.
- • Portfolio reallocation models are shifting from 60/40 to structures such as 50/30/20 or 40/30/30, incorporating alternatives and real assets to address declining returns in traditional equity and bond markets driven by lower-than-historic interest rates and maturing bull market conditions.
- • Private real estate and real assets are positioned as core portfolio diversifiers that offer higher long-term return potential, lower correlations to traditional equities and bonds, and natural inflation hedging characteristics—critical advantages in the current macroeconomic environment.
- • Public market alternative strategies enable tactical positioning into temporary market dislocations while less liquid strategies compound returns over extended time horizons with reduced systematic risk exposure.
- • Top-down portfolio construction based on client-specific return objectives, risk tolerance, and illiquidity capacity has become the standard approach among leading RIAs integrating alternatives, replacing one-size-fits-all allocation frameworks.
Summary
The traditional 60/40 stock-and-bond portfolio—a cornerstone of wealth management for decades—faces significant headwinds as leading Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) architect more diversified allocation frameworks incorporating alternatives and real assets. While many wealth management firms continue operating within the 60/40 construct, a cohort of sophisticated advisors including BBR Partners, The Colony Group, Laird Norton Wealth Management, Mercer Advisors, Osaic (formerly Advisor Group), and Savant Wealth Management have already implemented structural portfolio reforms.
Industry observers attribute this shift to two primary factors: the belief that the historic equity market bull run is maturing, and persistently depressed bond yields relative to historical norms—though recent Federal Reserve rate increases have begun to normalize the fixed-income landscape. In response, leading RIAs are reconfiguring portfolios from the traditional 60/40 model toward alternatives-inclusive structures, potentially rebalanced as 50/30/20 or 40/30/30 allocations.
BBR Partners, a SEC-registered investment adviser with operations in New York, San Francisco, and Chicago, articulates the strategic rationale for this evolution. According to the firm, alternatives and real assets exposure is fundamental to achieving true portfolio diversification. Public market alternative strategies allow advisors to "tactically lean into temporary market dislocations," while less liquid strategies—particularly private real estate and real assets—are positioned to generate higher returns over extended compounding periods with lower correlations to traditional equities and bonds. Critically, many of these strategies function as inflation hedges, a material consideration in volatile macroeconomic environments.
The Colony Group emphasizes a disciplined, top-down construction methodology: advisors now structure portfolios based on explicit client return objectives, risk tolerance, and capacity for illiquid asset exposure, rather than adhering to standardized allocation templates. This customization reflects a market recognition that heterogeneous client circumstances demand heterogeneous solutions, and that alternatives—increasingly treated as core portfolio components rather than tactical overlays—merit systematic integration into wealth management strategy.
Industry observers attribute this shift to two primary factors: the belief that the historic equity market bull run is maturing, and persistently depressed bond yields relative to historical norms—though recent Federal Reserve rate increases have begun to normalize the fixed-income landscape. In response, leading RIAs are reconfiguring portfolios from the traditional 60/40 model toward alternatives-inclusive structures, potentially rebalanced as 50/30/20 or 40/30/30 allocations.
BBR Partners, a SEC-registered investment adviser with operations in New York, San Francisco, and Chicago, articulates the strategic rationale for this evolution. According to the firm, alternatives and real assets exposure is fundamental to achieving true portfolio diversification. Public market alternative strategies allow advisors to "tactically lean into temporary market dislocations," while less liquid strategies—particularly private real estate and real assets—are positioned to generate higher returns over extended compounding periods with lower correlations to traditional equities and bonds. Critically, many of these strategies function as inflation hedges, a material consideration in volatile macroeconomic environments.
The Colony Group emphasizes a disciplined, top-down construction methodology: advisors now structure portfolios based on explicit client return objectives, risk tolerance, and capacity for illiquid asset exposure, rather than adhering to standardized allocation templates. This customization reflects a market recognition that heterogeneous client circumstances demand heterogeneous solutions, and that alternatives—increasingly treated as core portfolio components rather than tactical overlays—merit systematic integration into wealth management strategy.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.