AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Spotlight On Pension Fund Investment in Real Estate

Reported by Reason
Oct 25, 2016· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • As of September 2016, public sector pension plans had $681 billion invested in real estate, the largest allocation of any institutional investor category tracked by Preqin's Real Estate Spotlight report.
  • • Private sector pension plans held $340 billion in real estate, while public pensions made up 15% of institutional real estate investors, second only to private pensions at 19%.
  • • Roughly nine in 10 domestic and international public pension funds currently invest in some form of real estate.
  • • CalPERS ($27 billion) and CalSTRS ($26 billion) rank among the top five global pension funds by real estate holdings.
  • • The Reason Foundation cautions that public plans face limits on diversification into real estate due to volatility, housing-cycle exposure, and the need for staff expertise in illiquid assets.
Summary
Public sector pension plans have increasingly turned to real estate to supplement lower yields from bonds and equities. According to a Preqin Real Estate Spotlight report issued in October 2016, public sector pension plans had $681 billion invested in real estate as of September 2016, the largest amount of any institutional investor category covered by the report. Private sector pension plans had allocated $340 billion to the asset class, though a slightly greater number of private plans participate in real estate markets. Preqin found that public pensions account for 15% of institutional real estate investors, second only to private pensions at 19%.

The report indicates that roughly nine in 10 domestic and international public pension funds currently hold some form of real estate. Domestic public pension funds CalPERS and CalSTRS ranked among the five largest global pension investors in the asset class, with holdings of $27 billion and $26 billion, respectively.

The Reason Foundation, a policy research organization, argues that real estate suits pension plans because of their long-term liabilities and the asset's long-term holding profile. It also notes that public plans are several steps removed from the taxpayers who ultimately bear investment losses, and that a multi-generational taxpayer base cannot have a clearly defined risk tolerance. As a result, the foundation contends there is a practical limit to diversification for public plans, and that less risky assets should carry significant weight in their portfolios.

The foundation identifies three risks: high-volatility global real estate can produce swings between high yields and substantial losses; overexposure to domestic real estate could expose plans to housing-cycle downturns that depress annual returns and increase unfunded liability amortization payments; and past performance does not guarantee future results, so plans must ensure investment staff can handle the complexity and illiquidity of the asset class. Morgan Stanley is quoted as saying there are no bulletproof deals, but portfolios can be monitored and managed for risk. Investors are advised to monitor property sector exposure across geography, risk classification, asset life cycle, investment structure, and external manager type.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Reason Spotlight On Pension Fund Investment in Real Estate