Key Takeaways
- • St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Heather Cunningham dismissed Morrison & Foerster and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough from a legal malpractice case filed against them by venture capital fund Sentinel Group Holdings, citing lack of personal jurisdiction over the out-of-state firms.
- • The dismissal order, issued August 5, 2026, leaves only Husch Blackwell and Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway as remaining defendants in the case alleging defective advice regarding a federal tax evasion conviction that disqualified fund founder Burton Morriss from participating in fund-raising activities.
- • Both dismissed firms successfully argued that their attorneys worked remotely from locations outside Missouri and never solicited business within the state; Nelson Mullins' counsel noted that firm attorney Joseph Daniels was a New York-based lawyer who conducted all work via phone and email communications.
- • The jurisdictional dismissal reflects established case law holding that remote legal advice delivered through telecommunications and email, even if used or relied upon in-state, does not establish sufficient personal jurisdiction for a defendant law firm.
Summary
A Missouri state court has narrowed a legal malpractice dispute involving a venture capital fund by dismissing two major law firms on jurisdictional grounds. St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Heather Cunningham ruled on August 5, 2026, that Morrison & Foerster and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough lacked sufficient in-state contacts to remain defendants in the lawsuit, despite their alleged roles in advising Sentinel Group Holdings.
The case centers on allegations that multiple firms, including the dismissed defendants and Husch Blackwell, provided defective legal advice to the St. Louis-based venture capital fund. Specifically, Sentinel Group Holdings alleges the firms failed to recognize and advise the fund that founder Burton Morriss faced a disqualifying federal tax evasion conviction that barred his participation in fund-raising activities. The original complaint, filed January 26, 2026, also named Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway as a defendant based on her prior work as Morriss' personal attorney and her role in organizing Sentinel while serving as a partner at Husch Blackwell.
In their dismissal motions filed July 10 and 14, both firms argued they lacked the requisite minimum contacts with Missouri to permit the court to exercise jurisdiction. Attorneys representing Nelson Mullins, working with co-counsel from Carmody Macdonald and King & Spalding, emphasized that their lawyer, Joseph Daniels, was a New York-based attorney who never entered Missouri and conducted all work remotely via phone and email. They contended that established case law does not permit personal jurisdiction based solely on communications containing legal advice that may be used or relied upon in the state.
Judge Cunningham's order, entered following oral argument on July 16, accepted these jurisdictional arguments and dismissed both firms from the case. The ruling leaves Husch Blackwell and Catherine Hanaway as the sole remaining defendants facing the malpractice allegations. The decision underscores how geographic separation and remote work arrangements can shield out-of-state counsel from liability exposure in state court proceedings, even when their advice directly concerns in-state clients and transactions.
The case centers on allegations that multiple firms, including the dismissed defendants and Husch Blackwell, provided defective legal advice to the St. Louis-based venture capital fund. Specifically, Sentinel Group Holdings alleges the firms failed to recognize and advise the fund that founder Burton Morriss faced a disqualifying federal tax evasion conviction that barred his participation in fund-raising activities. The original complaint, filed January 26, 2026, also named Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway as a defendant based on her prior work as Morriss' personal attorney and her role in organizing Sentinel while serving as a partner at Husch Blackwell.
In their dismissal motions filed July 10 and 14, both firms argued they lacked the requisite minimum contacts with Missouri to permit the court to exercise jurisdiction. Attorneys representing Nelson Mullins, working with co-counsel from Carmody Macdonald and King & Spalding, emphasized that their lawyer, Joseph Daniels, was a New York-based attorney who never entered Missouri and conducted all work remotely via phone and email. They contended that established case law does not permit personal jurisdiction based solely on communications containing legal advice that may be used or relied upon in the state.
Judge Cunningham's order, entered following oral argument on July 16, accepted these jurisdictional arguments and dismissed both firms from the case. The ruling leaves Husch Blackwell and Catherine Hanaway as the sole remaining defendants facing the malpractice allegations. The decision underscores how geographic separation and remote work arrangements can shield out-of-state counsel from liability exposure in state court proceedings, even when their advice directly concerns in-state clients and transactions.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.