AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Why large evergreen funds might be the losers in VC

Reported by Pitchbook
Aug 31, 2026· 3 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Large evergreen funds managed by scale-focused alternative managers like Blackstone and Apollo Global Management may underperform in venture capital due to capacity constraints inherent to the asset class, which requires selective, high-conviction investment decisions rather than capital deployment at scale.
  • • Venture capital exhibits the widest performance dispersion of any private market strategy, with a 16.6% IRR spread between top- and bottom-quartile funds for 2005-2020 vintages (versus 14.4% for PE growth), making access to elite managers critical for institutional and individual investors.
  • • Fairway Capital Management, founded in 2020 by former Adams Street Partners COO Kevin Callahan, has positioned its evergreen fund of funds ($26.3 million in net assets as of March 31, 2026) as an alternative to large-scale evergreen vehicles by targeting smaller, higher-performing venture managers typically unavailable to individual investors.
  • • Unlike infrastructure and large buyout strategies—which benefit from scalable capital deployment—venture capital's capacity constraints make it fundamentally difficult for large evergreen vehicles to maintain performance expectations while continuously raising and deploying capital.
Summary
The rapid expansion of evergreen fund vehicles among major alternative asset managers presents a structural challenge in venture capital that smaller, specialized managers are attempting to exploit. While giants such as Blackstone and Apollo Global Management have successfully launched evergreen products in scalable asset classes like infrastructure and large buyouts, venture capital operates under fundamentally different dynamics that may disadvantage oversized vehicles seeking to deploy capital continuously.

According to PitchBook's Q4 2025 Global Fund Performance report, venture capital displays the widest performance gap between top and bottom performers of any private market strategy, with a 16.6% IRR spread for 2005-2020 vintages compared to 14.4% for private equity growth funds. This performance dispersion reflects venture capital's inherent capacity constraints—the market simply lacks sufficient high-conviction investment opportunities to absorb unlimited capital at consistent returns. Kevin Callahan, founder and former COO of Adams Street Partners, frames the challenge directly: "It's very difficult and probably impossible to continue to put more and more money [into capacity-constrained asset classes] and deliver the performance that people expect from them."

Fairway Capital Management, established in 2020 by Callahan and other former Adams Street executives, is positioning itself to capitalize on this structural weakness in large-scale evergreen approaches. The firm raised two venture capital funds of funds totaling $52 million in commitments before launching its flagship Fairway Private Equity & Venture Capital Opportunities Fund at the end of 2021. This evergreen vehicle, holding approximately $26.3 million in net assets as of March 31, 2026, targets individual investors by providing access to top-tier venture and growth equity managers "typically only available to large institutional investors." By focusing on selective manager access rather than attempting unlimited capital deployment, Fairway's model directly contrasts with the volume-oriented approach of larger evergreen vehicles, suggesting that specialization and manager selectivity may outperform scale in venture capital's capacity-constrained environment.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Pitchbook Why large evergreen funds might be the losers in VC